Most scholars agree that King Alfred (A.D. 849–899) personally translated a number of Latin texts into Old English. One historian contends that Alfred also personally penned his own law code, arguing that the numerous differences between the language of the law code and Alfred's translations of Latin texts are outweighed by the even more numerous similarities. Linguistic similarities, however, are what one expects in texts from the same language, the same time, and the same region. Apart from Alfred's surviving translations and law code,there are only two other extant works from the same dialect and milieu, so it is risky to assume here that linguistic similarities point to common authorship.
The passage above proceeds by
providing examples that underscore another argument's conclusion
questioning the plausibility of an assumption on which another argument depends
showing that a principle if generally applied would have anomalous consequences
showing that the premises of another argument are mutually inconsistent
using argument by analogy to undermine a principle implicit in another argument
C.说明一个原则如果被广泛应用会造成不合适的后果(文章并没有说这个原则被大范围应用可能造成不好的后果,而是直接质疑了这个原则)
D.说明另一个论点的假设们互相不相容(这里注意看premise用了复数,强调的是几个假设的对比,而文中就一个假设,何来对比?)
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论