Traditionally, decision-making by managers that is reasoned step-by-step has been considered preferable to intuitive decision-making. However, a recent study found that top managers used intuition significantly more than did most middle- or lower-level managers. This confirms the alternative view that intuition is actually more effective than careful, methodical reasoning.
The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
Methodical, step-by-step reasoning is inappropriate for making many real-life management decisions.
Top managers have the ability to use either intuitive reasoning or methodical, step-by-step reasoning in making decisions.
The decisions made by middle- and lower-level managers can be made as easily by using methodical reasoning as by using intuitive reasoning.
Top managers use intuitive reasoning in making the majority of their decisions.
Top managers are more effective at decision-making than middle- or lower-level managers.
前提,top比下级用直觉做决定多;结论,直觉更有效。差个gap:top的决定比下层更有效。
cr
assumption题
more effective 出现在结论而没有出现在premise,那么它肯定会出现在正确选项
P : top managers比middle managers更多使用直觉做决定-> C: 直觉比常规推理更有效果
gap 在于‘更多的使用’和‘更有效果’之间的关系
choice e补出了这个gap: top manager做的决定比middle managers做的决定更effective
原文说top比middle用直觉做决定更多,得出的结论是直觉做决定更有效,需要填补多和有效之间的gap,如果top manager做的决定都是无效决定,并不能说明直觉决定就更有效
棒棒哒
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
看到E的反应就是 这不就是把原文重复了一下
MARK啊
好吧...别想多。。。不敢选E,太明显的答案不敢选了。。