Images from ground-based telescopes are invariably distorted by the Earth's atmosphere. Orbiting space telescopes, however, operating above Earth's atmosphere, should provide superbly detailed images. Therefore, ground-based telescopes will soon become obsolete for advanced astronomical research purposes.
Which of the following statements, if true, would cast the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?
An orbiting space telescope due to be launched this year is far behind schedule and over budget, whereas the largest ground-based telescope was both within budget and on schedule.
Ground-based telescopes located on mountain summits are not subject to the kinds of atmospheric distortion which, at low altitudes, make stars appear to twinkle.
By careful choice of observatory location, it is possible for largeaperture telescopes to avoid most of the kind of wind turbulence that can distort image quality.
When large-aperture telescopes are located at high altitudes near the equator, they permit the best Earth-based observations of the center of the Milky Way Galaxy, a prime target of astronomical research.
Detailed spectral analyses, upon which astronomers rely for determining the chemical composition and evolutionary history of stars, require telescopes with more light-gathering capacity than space telescopes can provide.
这题几个选项真的都很有迷惑性了 希望老师讲一讲啊啊啊啊 A的问题在于只看了this year有很大局限性,b只说了可以避免一种distortion,c只是一种possibility,d 只是permit 依然不是最佳。。。同时cd里提到的都是large-aperture telescopes而不是ground-based telescopes。这样只剩下E。看起来最强烈。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论