Images from ground-based telescopes are invariably distorted by the Earth's atmosphere. Orbiting space telescopes, however, operating above Earth's atmosphere, should provide superbly detailed images. Therefore, ground-based telescopes will soon become obsolete for advanced astronomical research purposes.
Which of the following statements, if true, would cast the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?
An orbiting space telescope due to be launched this year is far behind schedule and over budget, whereas the largest ground-based telescope was both within budget and on schedule.
Ground-based telescopes located on mountain summits are not subject to the kinds of atmospheric distortion which, at low altitudes, make stars appear to twinkle.
By careful choice of observatory location, it is possible for largeaperture telescopes to avoid most of the kind of wind turbulence that can distort image quality.
When large-aperture telescopes are located at high altitudes near the equator, they permit the best Earth-based observations of the center of the Milky Way Galaxy, a prime target of astronomical research.
Detailed spectral analyses, upon which astronomers rely for determining the chemical composition and evolutionary history of stars, require telescopes with more light-gathering capacity than space telescopes can provide.
削弱。。地上的望远镜要过时了
A 这和以后是不是要过时了无关
BCD 都在讲地面望远镜可以克服它的缺点,但从没有提到太空望远镜。可能太空望远镜比地面更先进
E 讲了地面望远镜与太空望远镜对比 太空望远镜的劣势,说明地面还是有用 选最优的答案
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论