扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / OG2017V-SC-229
Government officials announced that restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river resulted from the intermittent showers that had fallen throughout the area the day before.
restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciative increase in the level of the river
restricting the use of water would continue because there had not been any appreciative increase in the river's level that
the use of water would continue to be restricted because not any appreciable increase in the river's level had
restrictions on the use of water would continue because no appreciable increase in the level of the river had
using water would continue being restricted because not any appreciable increase in the level of the river
- use of "the use of water" leads to unnecessary passive voice
- "not any.." is unidiomatic and can be replaced by simple "no.."，同D
从判决的背景来看，很明显，只有在河水水平没有按照预期上升之后才会发布公告。 这就是宣布这一消息的原因。
因此，为了在这两个相关事件之间建立正确的顺序，我们使用过去完成时间来发生之前发生的事件 - 结果。
现在，间歇性阵雨在前一天下降。 由于阵雨是间歇性的，河水水位没有按要求增加。 所以这两个事件也是相关的。
但由于阵雨在河流水位没有明显上升之前下降，这个动作也用过去的完整时态动词写成。
所以现在，我们有两个以过去完成时态写的事件。 为了使这两个过去事件之间的排序清楚，使用了前一天的短语。 这句话使得所有相关事件的排序绝对清晰。
announce. had resulted .had fallen
因为announce必定是在resulted后面的 所以为了区分 resulted用了过去完成时 而后面也用了过去完成时 他们两之间其实也有时间前后关系。如何区分呢。 注意以上the day before就是把这两者又做了个区分
因此，为了在这两个相关事件之间建立正确的顺序，我们使用过去完成时间来发生之前发生的事件 - 结果。
现在，间歇性阵雨在前一天下降。 由于阵雨是间歇性的，河水水位没有按要求增加。 所以这两个事件也是相关的。
但由于阵雨在河流水位没有明显上升之前下降，这个动作也用过去的完整时态动词写成。
所以现在，我们有两个以过去完成时态写的事件。 为了使这两个过去事件之间的排序清楚，使用了前一天的短语。 这句话使得所有相关事件的排序绝对清晰。
C 无生命of结构比‘s好 not any 不如no
E 时态错误 not any wordy
B选项：there had not been是wordy的表达；that错误的指代level,level 导致，与文章想表达的前面的整个事件resulted ...不符；
C选项：使用the use of water would continue to be restricted，而非restrictions on the use of water造成wordy;更加wordy的是not any appreciable increase；
E选项：错误同上
这个说的像样登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
- "not any.." is unidiomatic and can be replaced by simple "no.."
- Also missing "had" at the end, distorting the temporal relationship between "increase in level" and "intermittent rain"
- use of "the use of water" leads to unnecessary passive voice
- "not any.." is unidiomatic and can be replaced by simple "no.."
- "appreciative" is incorrect
- "that" seems incorrect modifier
- "appreciative" is incorrect
- Also missing "had" at the end, distorting the temporal relationship between "increase in level" and "intermittent rain"
1. "appreciative" - showing gratitude VS "appreciable" - noticeable - Slight difference in word but huge difference in meaning. And "increase" can not be appreciative.
2. "Restriction" should be the main subject to convey the meaning succinctly.
clause, this version of the sentence necessitates the use of a wordy and
indirect passive infinitive phrase to be restricted.