Many kitchens today are equipped with high-speed electrical gadgets, such as blenders and food processors, which are able to inflict as serious injuries as those caused by an industrial wood-planing machine.
which are able to inflict as serious injuries as those
which can inflict serious injuries such as those
inflicting injuries as serious as that having been
capable to inflict injuries as serious as that
capable of inflicting injuries as serious as those
总结了一下:
a 1.which定语从句只能就近修饰(这里的就近修饰最多可以跳过介宾),但它应该修饰的不是 food processors,而是high-speed electrical gadgets。(虽然such as是插入语,但是which也不能跳跃修饰,ron讲过中间有插入语这种,which离得太远也不能选)
2. as...as结构之间只能是adj./adv.不能是n
b 1.which修饰错误同A
2.such as错误,原句的意思是厨房的gadgets造成的伤害和工业机器造成的伤害一样严重,对比的是伤害程度,而B用工业机器造成的伤害来举例说明gadgets造成的严重伤害,导致对比的是伤害的种类(those指代injuries),既改变了原句的意思也不合逻辑
c that错,that是单数指代,前面没有单数名词
d that错同C
最后那一句它到底修饰的是哪个词呢?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论