Scientists long believed that two nerve clusters in the human hypothalamus, called suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCNs), were what controlled our circadian rhythms. Those rhythms are the biological cycles that recur approximately every 24 hours in synchronization with the cycle of sunlight and darkness caused by Earth's rotation. Studies have demonstrated that in some animals, the SCNs control daily fluctuations in blood pressure, body temperature, activity level, and alertness, as well as the nighttime release of the sleeppromoting agent melatonin. Furthermore, cells in the human retina dedicated to transmitting information about light levels to the SCNs have recently been discovered.
Four critical genes governing circadian cycles have been found to be active in every tissue, however, not just the SCNs, of flies, mice, and humans. In addition, when laboratory rats that usually ate at will were fed only once a day, peak activity of a clock gene in their livers shifted by 12 hours, whereas the same clock gene in the SCNs remained synchronized with light cycles. While scientists do not dispute the role of the SCNs in controlling core functions such as the regulation of body temperature and blood pressure, scientists now believe that circadian clocks in other organs and tissues may respond to external cues other than light—including temperature changes—that recur regularly every 24 hours.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
challenge recent findings that appear to contradict earlier findings
present two sides of an ongoing scientific debate
report answers to several questions that have long puzzled researchers
discuss evidence that has caused a long-standing belief to be revised
attempt to explain a commonly misunderstood biological phenomenon
文章大意:
1)科学家一直相信:SCNs 控制生物周期circadian rhythms(1. 解释CR是随昼夜每24小时变化的;2.SCNs的具体作用;3.给SCNs传递光的细胞也被发现)
2)However,除了SCNs的其他四个控制CR的genes也在各个组织中被发现;实验证明CR可能也受光之外的因素影响
题目分析:文章主旨题
选项分析:
A选项:质疑与旧观点相悖的新观点:文章在讨论一个新的发现,推翻了之前的观点,没有质疑新观点。
B选项:展现一个持续进行的辩论的双方观点:文章并没有提一个辩论。
C选项:报道了几个长期困扰科学家的问题的答案:文章没有提到科学家有“好几个”疑惑,且也没有提到困扰了“很长时间”。
D选项:正确。讨论了一个证据,这个证据修改了本来一直被相信的理论:科学家本来相信只有SCNs控制生物周期,后来的证据发现还有其他四个关键基因也起到同样作用。
E选项:试着解释一个被普遍误解的生物现象:文章讨论的生物现象没有被误解,只是提出了新的解释。
D. 讨论了一个证据,这个证据修改了本来一直被相信的理论
A选项并没有推翻之前的观点,作者不否认SCNs的作用
misunderstood 不准确, 没有完全推翻之前的观点,只是revise
long believed, give evidence to revise修正
long-standing belief 对应的一段观点,以及首段long believed;第二段evidence造成原观点revised,对应文章最后一句话now believe
Scientists long believed, 后面给的evidence to revise,所以是D
主旨题,提出新观点,没有否认旧观点。1并没有contrast早期观点 3没有answer questions 4没有要修改long-standing belief 5misunderstood
我也觉得选B,但为什么答案给D
D提出新观点,证据,修改旧观点,
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论