Much research has been devoted to investigating what motivates consumers to try new products. Previous consumer research suggests that both the price of a new product and the way it is advertised affect consumers' perceptions of the product's performance risk (the possibility that the product will not function as consumers expect and/or will not provide the desired benefits). Some of this research has concluded that a relatively high price will reduce a consumer's perception of the performance risk associated with purchasing a particular product, while other studies have reported that price has little or no effect on perceived performance risk. These conflicting findings may simply be due to the nature of product advertisements: a recent study indicates that the presentation of an advertised message has a marked effect on the relationship between price and perceived performance risk.
Researchers have identified consumers' perception of the credibility of the source of an advertised message-i.e., the manufacturer—as another factor affecting perceived performance risk: one study found that the greater the source credibility, the lower the consumer's perception of the risk of purchasing an advertised new product. However, past research suggests that the relationship between source credibility and perceived performance risk may be more complex: source credibility may interact with price in a subtle way to affect consumers' judgments of the performance risk associated with an advertised product.
According to the passage, the studies referred to in the highlighted text reported which of the following about the effect of price on consumers' perception of the performance risk associated with a new product?
Although most consumers regard price as an important factor, their perception of the performance risk associated with a new product is ultimately determined by the manufacturer's reputation.
Price interacts with the presentation of an advertised message to affect perceived performance risk.
Price does not significantly affect consumers' perception of the performance risk associated with a new product.
Consumers tend to regard price as more important than the manufacturer's credibility when they are buying from that manufacturer for the first time.
Consumers are generally less concerned about a new product's performance risk when that product is relatively expensive.
文章大意:
1. 研究内容:影响消费者尝试新产品的因素
研究结果:1) 价格→ a. 价格越高,风险越低 b. 价格无影响
差别原因:2) 广告的影响
2. 3)广告来源的可信度
a. 可信度越高,风险越低
b. 关系更复杂:价格+可信度→打广告的产品
(总结一下就是列出三个影响因素,及其三者之间and各自与产品的关系)
题目分析:
文章细节题:高亮的研究认为价格对消费者接受度有什么影响?
原文:然而别的研究认为价格对risk没有或者有只有一点点影响。
选项分析:
A选项:尽管大部分消费者认为价格是一个很重要的因素,但他们对新产品的看法最终取决于制造商的信誉度:原文没提。
B选项:价格和广告内容一起作用于perceivedperformance risk:这个研究没有提到广告。
C选项:正确。价格对ppr的影响不显著:与原文一致。
D选项:当消费者第一次购买时,他们认为价格比制造商的可信度更重要:这个研究没提可信度。
E选项:当商品价格较高时,消费者不担心ppr:与原文不一致。
被之后一句干扰到了......看清楚是什么东西的观点!!!相关推论以及在在这些观点上总结通通不管!!!
估计是选晕头了,错选了B,回过头重做一次,直接选C。低级错误。
studies refers to "price has little or no effect on perceived performance risk"
A选项:does not mention
B选项:does not mention
C选项:价钱并不会极大的影响顾客对于performance risk 的理解;
D选项:does not mention
E选项:之前的观点的意思,但是the study转折了
大意:一项研究什么因素影响顾客购买新产品。之前的研究显示价格和产品广告的方式影响顾客对于产品的表现风险(会不会正常运作或是会不会获得相应的益处),其中有很多调查显示产品价格越高,顾客对于产品表现风险越低;还有一些研究表示产品表现风险与价格无关。而这些矛盾有可能与产品所做的广告{本质}有关,广告产品会减少人们对于产品表现风险的怀疑{广告会对于价格和产品表现风险之间的关系有影响}。
研究已经识别出广告对于信任源(生产商)的影响{广告的信任源对于产品表现风险的影响},资源的信任度越高,产品表现风险越低;然而,其两者之间的关系貌似没这么简单:资源信任度与价格相互作用,影响着做了广告的产品的产品表现风险。
原文 has little or no effect on perceived performance risk. c项相同意思,no significant。