Much research has been devoted to investigating what motivates consumers to try new products. Previous consumer research suggests that both the price of a new product and the way it is advertised affect consumers' perceptions of the product's performance risk (the possibility that the product will not function as consumers expect and/or will not provide the desired benefits). Some of this research has concluded that a relatively high price will reduce a consumer's perception of the performance risk associated with purchasing a particular product, while other studies have reported that price has little or no effect on perceived performance risk. These conflicting findings may simply be due to the nature of product advertisements: a recent study indicates that the presentation of an advertised message has a marked effect on the relationship between price and perceived performance risk.
Researchers have identified consumers' perception of the credibility of the source of an advertised message-i.e., the manufacturer—as another factor affecting perceived performance risk: one study found that the greater the source credibility, the lower the consumer's perception of the risk of purchasing an advertised new product. However, past research suggests that the relationship between source credibility and perceived performance risk may be more complex: source credibility may interact with price in a subtle way to affect consumers' judgments of the performance risk associated with an advertised product.
The passage is primarily concerned with
challenging the implications of previous research into why consumers try new products
suggesting new marketing strategies for attracting consumers to new products
reconciling two different views about the effect of price on consumers' willingness to try new products
describing a new approach to researching why consumers try new products
discussing certain findings regarding why consumers try new products
题目分析:文章主旨题。
选项分析:
A选项:质疑之前的研究对“消费者为啥尝试新产品”的影响:文章没有体现出质疑的态度,以及以前研究带来的影响。
B选项:推荐一个可以吸引新客户的市场策略:文章只是阐述了一个研究结果,没有体现出用这个结果吸引消费者的态度。
C选项:使两个不同的关于“价格对消费者尝试新产品的意愿的影响”的观点一致:价格只是影响因素之一;也没有“使一致”。
D选项:描述一个新的“研究消费者为啥尝试新产品”的方法:没有提到研究方法。
E选项:正确。讨论关于“消费者为啥尝试新产品”的研究发现:文章列出了几个影响因素(研究结果),并具体讨论。
开头第一句话就是,what motivate consumers to try new products. 错选了C, reconcile是使一致的意思。文章虽然有谈到不同的view,但并没有使一致,而是分别论述造成差异的潜在原因。
rc
de选错d
de的意思乍看一眼差不多,然而陷阱在小的词组和词意上,approach方法,途径
很容易理解d“describing a new approach to researching why consumers try new products”成“describe new findings about why。。”;但是其意思是“describe new approach to reseaching why。。” 重点是词组短语“new approach to researching” 意思完全不同于finding
gmac很爱在这种选项中小的细节点设置陷阱
A选项:summarize the conflict of these findings, but does not support any finding over others;
B选项:does not suggest any strategy
C选项:only one supporting point in the passage's larger purpose of summarizing research
D选项:does not describe
C选项:使两个不同的关于“价格对消费者尝试新产品的意愿的影响”的观点一致:①价格只是影响因素之一;②也没有“使一致”。
文章虽然有谈到不同的view,但并没有使一致,而是论述【造成差异的潜在原因】。
第一段最后一句: These [conflicting findings] may simply be [due to] the nature of product advertisements
有different views√ 无reconcile× 只是阐述了造成相互冲突的原因!
GMAT阅读里是不是很少有reconcile的啊?感觉没遇到过,也想象不太出来
两段分别从价格和商家信用对消费者的风险感知能力的影响来说的,并没有reconcile
price只是其中一个方面,不是全文主旨
原来这样就算certain了
C选项:使两个不同的关于“价格对消费者尝试新产品的意愿的影响”的观点一致:价格只是影响因素之一;也没有“使一致”。
(1)作者意图;(2)写作手法
what motivates consumers to try new products= why consumers try new products
错选D。
回过头再选E是正确答案。注意:分析new approach和certain findings的区别,不难选对。
D选项即使是只讲了第二段的内容,也不是research的方法,而主要讲通过这种research得出结论,产品可信度会影响消费者购买习惯。
whats more,全文不止讲了新发现,第一段也提及了老的发现
看清选项关键词,分清主次,D是说 new approach to research, E是说 certain findings, 而我们发现的这些相互影响的现象应该是certain findings。
C和E纠结
错选C- 里面偷偷夹了effect of price on, 如果没有这个限定还能C考虑考虑
没有也不行啊,reconcile是调和,作者并没有调和这两种观点,只是很客观地在阐述
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
D为什么不对?credibility难道不是一个new approach?
为什么不选A呢?
因为没有 challenge。没有反驳啊,说她不对啊,作者主观上没有观点,都是写的别的观点。他每展开一个观点,都是说 “ study 说“。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论