In the Sonoran Desert of northwestern Mexico and southern Arizona, the flowers of several species of columnar cacti-cardon, saguaro, and organ pipe-were once exclusively pollinated at night by nectar-feeding bats, as their close relatives in arid tropical regions of southern Mexico still are. In these tropical regions, diurnal(daytime) visitors to columnar cactus flowers are ineffective pollinators because, by sunrise, the flowers' stigmas become unreceptive or the flowers close. Yet the flowers of the Sonoran Desert cacti have evolved to remain open after sunrise, allowing pollination by such diurnal visitors as bees and birds. Why have these cacti expanded their range of pollinators by remaining open and receptive in daylight?
This development at the northernmost range of columnar cacti may be due to a yearly variation in the abundance-and hence the reliability-of migratory nectar-feeding bats. Pollinators can be unreliable for several reasons. They can be dietary generalists whose fidelity to a particular species depends on the availability of alternative food sources. Or, they can be dietary specialists, but their abundance may vary widely from year to year, resulting in variable pollination of their preferred food species.Finally, they may be dietary specialists, but their abundance may be chronically low relative to the availability of flowers.
Recent data reveals that during spring in the Sonoran Desert, the nectar-feeding bats are specialists feeding on cardon,saguaro, and organpipe flowers. However, whereas cactus-flower abundance tends to be high during spring, bat population densities tend to be low except near maternity roosts. Moreover, in spring, diurnal cactus-pollinating birds are significantly more abundant in this region than are the nocturnal bats. Thus, with bats being unreliable cactus-flower pollinators, and daytime pollinators more abundant and therefore more reliable, selection favors the cactus flowers with traits that increase their range of pollinators. While data suggest that population densities of nectar-feedingbats are also low in tropical areas of southern Mexico, where bats are the exclusive pollinators of many species of columnar cacti, cactus-flower density and bat population density appear to be much more evenly balanced there:compared with the Sonoran Desert's cardon and saguaro, columnar cacti in southern Mexico produce far fewer flowers per night. Accordingly, despite their low population density, bats are able to pollinate nearly 100 percent of the available flowers.
According to the passage, which of the following types of nectar-feeding pollinators is likely to be an unreliable pollinator of a particular cactus flower?
A dietary specialist whose abundance is typically high in relation to that of the flower
A dietary specialist whose abundance is at times significantly lower than that of the flower
A dietary generalist for whom that flower's nectar is not a preferred food but is the most consistently available food
A dietary generalist for whom that flower's nectar is slightly preferred to other available foods
A dietary generalist that evolved from a species of dietary specialists
题目分析:
文章细节题:以下哪个传粉者可能最不靠谱?
原文:
饮食多样化者—— 他们的忠诚度取决于食物数量
饮食专家——他们专一,但数量可能在每年变化,影响授粉。
选项分析:
A选项:饮食专家的数量>花花的数量:这是靠谱的传粉者。
B选项:正确。饮食专家的数量<花花的数量:根据文章,这个不靠谱,这也是为什么S沙漠的仙人掌进化了(bat数量<花花数量;bat数量<鸟的数量)。
C选项:饮食多样化者发现某种花的数量多,尽管不是最优食物:这个花花数量多,靠谱的。
D选项:喜欢别的食物的饮食多样化者:喜欢这个花花,靠谱。
E选项:从饮食专家进化而来的饮食多样化者:原文没提。
第三个chronically low 长期性低
第二个buttheir abundance may vary widely from year to year, resulting in variable变化无常的 pollination of their preferred food species
答案B at times significantly lower 显然是unreliable的,我觉得对应的应该是第二个
C not a preferred food but is the most consistently available food 这反而容易成为一个reliable的
为什么你觉得第3个是reliable呢?我选的C,但是其实我觉得B、C都不太对,有点纠结。就是3个原因:
1)可能什么都吃,那么对特定食物的忠诚取决于其他的食物资源;
2)可能只吃一种食物,但是他们的数量每年变化很大,导致他们吃的那个食物种类的传粉的变化。
3)可能只吃一种食物,但是授粉者的数量长期很低(相对花来说)。
原因1是不是对应于C呢?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论