Manufacturers have to do more than build large manufacturing plants to realize economies of scale. It is true that as the capacity of a manufacturing operation rises, costs per unit of output fall as plant size approaches "minimum efficient scale," where the cost per unit of output reaches a minimum, determined roughly by the state of existing technology and size of the potential market. However, minimum efficient scale cannot be fully realized unless a steady "throughput" (the flow of materials through a plant) is attained. The throughput needed to maintain the optimal scale of production requires careful coordination not only of the flow of goods through the production process, but also of the flow of input from suppliers and the flow of output to wholesalers and final consumers. If throughput falls below a critical point, unit costs rise sharply and profits disappear. A manufacturer's fixed costs and "sunk costs" (original capital investment in the physical plant) do not decrease when production declines due to inadequate supplies of raw materials, problems on the factory floor, or inefficient sales networks. Consequently, potential economies of scale are based on the physical and engineering characteristics of the production facilities—that is, on tangible capital—but realized economies of scale are operational and organizational, and depend on knowledge, skills, experience, and teamwork—that is, on organized human capabilities, or intangible capital.
The importance of investing in intangible capital becomes obvious when one looks at what happens in new capital-intensive manufacturing industries. Such industries are quickly dominated, not by the first firms to acquire technologically sophisticated plants of theoretically optimal size, but rather by the first to exploit the full potential of such plants. Once some firms achieve this, a market becomes extremely hard to enter. Challengers must construct comparable plants and do so after the first movers have already worked out problems with suppliers or with new production processes. Challengers must create distribution networks and marketing systems in markets where first movers have all the contacts and know-how. And challengers must recruit management teams to compete with those that have already mastered these functional and strategic activities.
In the context of the passage as a whole, the second paragraph serves primarily to
provide an example to support the argument presented in the first paragraph
evaluate various strategies discussed in the first paragraph
introduce evidence that undermines the argument presented in the first paragraph
anticipate possible objections to the argument presented in the first paragraph
demonstrate the potential dangers of a commonly used strategy
题目分析:
文章推断题:第二段的作用是
第一段的结尾得出结论:无形资产也很重要。第二段接着具体论证无形资产对资本密集型行业尤为重要,若想成功需要如何如何;若想挑战大佬需要如何如何。
选项分析:
A选项:正确。提供了一个支持第一段观点的例子:以资本密集型产业为例,论证第一段结尾的结论。
B选项:评估第一段讨论的各种策略:文章并没有提出各种策略。
C选项:提出可以削弱第一段观点的证据:第二段是支持第一段的,不存在削弱。
D选项:反对第一段的观点:并没有。
E选项:提出一个被普遍使用的策略的潜在危险:并没有。
D anticipate possible objections to the argument presented in the first paragraph
anticipate objections to 是对XXX持反对意见的意思,objections是反对的意思,不是物体的意思。
P2是对P1提出的理论在实际中的指导应用
objection 缺点
evalute必须要有作者本人的观点,尤其是对于好坏、喜恶、可行与否这样的判断,第二段里显然没有,主要是规律本身的陈述
provide an example to support the argument presented in the first paragraph。 example = capital-intensive industry.唉。。。。这也能选错。
定位:Consequently 第一段总结,economies of scale...but realized on intangible capital. 第二段马上说投资无形资产的重要性,明显是支持第一段。 B评估也说得通,但是全文只说了投资无形资产一个策略,后半句不对 C削弱第一段,错 D反对,错 E 未提及策略有什么危险
结构题,第一段:合理的商业模式不只是投资固定资产,无形资产的投资也很重要。第二段:在capital-intensive industry里这个重要性非常明显