Manufacturers have to do more than build large manufacturing plants to realize economies of scale. It is true that as the capacity of a manufacturing operation rises, costs per unit of output fall as plant size approaches "minimum efficient scale," where the cost per unit of output reaches a minimum, determined roughly by the state of existing technology and size of the potential market. However, minimum efficient scale cannot be fully realized unless a steady "throughput" (the flow of materials through a plant) is attained. The throughput needed to maintain the optimal scale of production requires careful coordination not only of the flow of goods through the production process, but also of the flow of input from suppliers and the flow of output to wholesalers and final consumers. If throughput falls below a critical point, unit costs rise sharply and profits disappear. A manufacturer's fixed costs and "sunk costs" (original capital investment in the physical plant) do not decrease when production declines due to inadequate supplies of raw materials, problems on the factory floor, or inefficient sales networks. Consequently, potential economies of scale are based on the physical and engineering characteristics of the production facilities—that is, on tangible capital—but realized economies of scale are operational and organizational, and depend on knowledge, skills, experience, and teamwork—that is, on organized human capabilities, or intangible capital.
The importance of investing in intangible capital becomes obvious when one looks at what happens in new capital-intensive manufacturing industries. Such industries are quickly dominated, not by the first firms to acquire technologically sophisticated plants of theoretically optimal size, but rather by the first to exploit the full potential of such plants. Once some firms achieve this, a market becomes extremely hard to enter. Challengers must construct comparable plants and do so after the first movers have already worked out problems with suppliers or with new production processes. Challengers must create distribution networks and marketing systems in markets where first movers have all the contacts and know-how. And challengers must recruit management teams to compete with those that have already mastered these functional and strategic activities.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
point out the importance of intangible capital for realizing economies of scale in manufacturing
show that manufacturers frequently gain a competitive advantage from investment in large manufacturing facilities
argue that large manufacturing facilities often fail because of inadequate investment in both tangible and intangible capital
suggest that most new industries are likely to be dominated by firms that build large manufacturing plants early
explain why large manufacturing plants usually do not help manufacturers achieve economies of scale
题目分析:
文章主旨题
选项分析:
(文章)
A选项:正确。指出无形资产在实现规模经济中的重要性。
B选项:认为制造商经常从投资生产机器中获得竞争优势:制造商如果可以充分开发硬件,则可以获得优势;但文章没有提“经常”。
C选项:认为大型生产机器经常失败因为对有形无形资产的投入都不够:文章认为制造商对无形资产的投入不够,对有形资产的投入是够的。
D选项:认为大多数行业的领头羊都是那种很早就建立大型生产设备的:与原文相悖。原文认为行业大佬是能充分开发而不是第一个建立硬件设施的。
E选项:解释为啥大型生产设备经常不能帮助制造商实现规模经济:文章主要在强调无形资产的重要性。
Manufacturers have to do more than build large manufacturing plants to realize economies of scale. --->realized economies of scale are operational and organizational, and depend on knowledge, skills, experience, and teamwork—that is, on organized human capabilities, or intangible capital. --->The importance of investing in intangible capital becomes obvious when one looks at what happens in new capital-intensive manufacturing industries. --->(A)
主旨题,e选项很迷惑,但文章主旨不能单看一段,如果文章后半部分有观点改变,那以后半部分为主。好的商业模式不只是投资固定资产---无形资产的投资很重要
E选项:解释为啥大型生产设备经常不能帮助制造商实现规模经济:文章主要在强调无形资产的重要性。
结论句里but 后面应该是重点。
rc
主旨题
读懂长难句开头结尾句
Consequently, potential economies of scale are based on the physical and engineering characteristics of the production facilities—that is, on tangible capital—but realized economies of scale are operational and organizational, and depend on knowledge, skills, experience, and teamwork—that is, on organized human capabilities, or intangible capital.
potential economies of scale are based on the physical and engineering characteristics of the production facilities—that is, on tangible capital—but realized economies of scale are operational and organizational, and depend on knowledge, skills, experience, and teamwork—that is, on organized human capabilities, or intangible capital. ---看文章整体而不是细节; 同时,文章也并没有重点解释为什么大型设备不能带来scale of economics
排除法
有几次概念转换,比如“large manufacturing plants”→“ tangible capital”
这篇文章逻辑有点绕,读懂了就不难选,第一句在肯定tangible capital对实现e of s具有作用的前提下,引出还有另一个影响e of s的变量。此后一直到“ or inefficient sales networks”都是解释tangible capital对e of s的影响为何有限,引入cost的概念(经济金融专业的应该都懂,就是那个fixed cost的图),在第一段最后一句得出结论:tangible capital决定potential e of s,realized e of s由intangible capital决定。
第二段就着结论,论证intangible capital在new capital-intensive manufacturing industries中无与伦比的重要性
可见全文的重点在于结论和结论后的内容,即A选项point out the importance of intangible capital for realizing economies of scale in manufacturing
定位:Consequently, potential economies of scale are ...but realized economies of scale are ...
第一段,结尾总结 but economies of scale是取决于无形资产。第二段转折开篇就讲无形资产的重要性。A
第一段总结在最后一句,第二段解释最后一句
11:20