A small number of the forest species of lepidoptera (moths and butterflies, which exist as caterpillars during most of their life cycle) exhibit regularly recurring patterns of population growth and decline—such fluctuations in population are known as population cycles. Although many different variables influence population levels, a regular pattern such as a population cycle seems to imply a dominant, driving force. Identification of that driving force, however, has proved surprisingly elusive despite considerable research. The common approach of studying causes of population cycles by measuring the mortality caused by different agents, such as predatory birds or parasites, has been unproductive in the case of lepidoptera. Moreover, population ecologists' attempts to alter cycles by changing the caterpillars' habitat and by reducing caterpillar populations have not succeeded. In short, the evidence implies that these insect populations, if not self-regulating, may at least be regulated by an agent more intimately connected with the insect than are predatory birds or parasites.

Recent work suggests that this agent may be a virus. For many years, viral disease had been reported in declining populations of caterpillars, but population ecologists had usually considered viral disease to have contributed to the decline once it was underway rather than to have initiated it. The recent work has been made possible by new techniques of molecular biology that allow viral DNA to be detected at low concentrations in the environment. Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses are hypothesized to be the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera in part because the viruses themselves follow an infectious cycle in which, if protected from direct sunlight, they may remain virulent for many years in the environment, embedded in durable crystals of polyhedrin protein. Once ingested by a caterpillar, the crystals dissolve, releasing the virus to infect the insect's cells. Late in the course of the infection, millions of new virus particles are formed and enclosed in polyhedrin crystals. These crystals reenter the environment after the insect dies and decomposes, thus becoming available to infect other caterpillars.

One of the attractions of this hypothesis is its broad applicability. Remarkably, despite significant differences in habitat and behavior, many species of lepidoptera have population cycles of similar length, between eight and 11 years. Nuclear polyhedrosis viral infection is one factor these disparate species share.


The primary purpose of the passage is to


describe the development of new techniques that may help to determine the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera

present evidence that refutes a particular theory about the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera

present a hypothesis about the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera

describe the fluctuating patterns of population cycles in lepidoptera

question the idea that a single driving force is behind population cycles in lepidoptera

考题讲解

文章大意:

1. 现象:population cycle

研究的问题:driving force是什么?

研究方法:

测量死亡率——失败

改变栖息地——失败

减少毛毛虫数量——失败

2. 猜想:driving force可能是个病毒;且技术发展可以帮助我们更好求证

3. 这个猜想的优点:可广泛应用

题目分析:

文章主旨题

文章提出一个现象并探讨背后真正的原因是什么。

选项分析:

A选项:描述了一个科技,这个科技帮助确定driving force是什么:文章第二段提到一个新技术可以帮助生物学家更好的求证,但这个“科技”并不是全文讨论的重点。

B选项:提出反驳一个理论的证据:文章没有出现反驳的态度。

C选项:正确。提出了一个关于driving force的假设:文章认为driving force可能是一个病毒,并进行论证。

D选项:
描述L的数量波动:没有提。

E选项:
质疑“只有一个driving force”:全文没有出现质疑的态度。

展开显示

登录注册 后可以参加讨论

OG2018-RC