A small number of the forest species of lepidoptera (moths and butterflies, which exist as caterpillars during most of their life cycle) exhibit regularly recurring patterns of population growth and decline—such fluctuations in population are known as population cycles. Although many different variables influence population levels, a regular pattern such as a population cycle seems to imply a dominant, driving force. Identification of that driving force, however, has proved surprisingly elusive despite considerable research. The common approach of studying causes of population cycles by measuring the mortality caused by different agents, such as predatory birds or parasites, has been unproductive in the case of lepidoptera. Moreover, population ecologists' attempts to alter cycles by changing the caterpillars' habitat and by reducing caterpillar populations have not succeeded. In short, the evidence implies that these insect populations, if not self-regulating, may at least be regulated by an agent more intimately connected with the insect than are predatory birds or parasites.
Recent work suggests that this agent may be a virus. For many years, viral disease had been reported in declining populations of caterpillars, but population ecologists had usually considered viral disease to have contributed to the decline once it was underway rather than to have initiated it. The recent work has been made possible by new techniques of molecular biology that allow viral DNA to be detected at low concentrations in the environment. Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses are hypothesized to be the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera in part because the viruses themselves follow an infectious cycle in which, if protected from direct sunlight, they may remain virulent for many years in the environment, embedded in durable crystals of polyhedrin protein. Once ingested by a caterpillar, the crystals dissolve, releasing the virus to infect the insect's cells. Late in the course of the infection, millions of new virus particles are formed and enclosed in polyhedrin crystals. These crystals reenter the environment after the insect dies and decomposes, thus becoming available to infect other caterpillars.
One of the attractions of this hypothesis is its broad applicability. Remarkably, despite significant differences in habitat and behavior, many species of lepidoptera have population cycles of similar length, between eight and 11 years. Nuclear polyhedrosis viral infection is one factor these disparate species share.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
describe the development of new techniques that may help to determine the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera
present evidence that refutes a particular theory about the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera
present a hypothesis about the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera
describe the fluctuating patterns of population cycles in lepidoptera
question the idea that a single driving force is behind population cycles in lepidoptera
文章大意:
1. 现象:population cycle
研究的问题:driving force是什么?
研究方法:
测量死亡率——失败
改变栖息地——失败
减少毛毛虫数量——失败
2. 猜想:driving force可能是个病毒;且技术发展可以帮助我们更好求证
3. 这个猜想的优点:可广泛应用
题目分析:
文章主旨题
文章提出一个现象并探讨背后真正的原因是什么。
选项分析:
A选项:描述了一个科技,这个科技帮助确定driving force是什么:文章第二段提到一个新技术可以帮助生物学家更好的求证,但这个“科技”并不是全文讨论的重点。
B选项:提出反驳一个理论的证据:文章没有出现反驳的态度。
C选项:正确。提出了一个关于driving force的假设:文章认为driving force可能是一个病毒,并进行论证。
D选项:描述L的数量波动:没有提。
E选项:质疑“只有一个driving force”:全文没有出现质疑的态度。
rc
主旨题,
一个现象,提出假设“选项:present a hypothesis about the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera”
第一段总结句In short, the evidence implies that these insect populations, if not self-regulating, may at least be regulated by an agent more intimately connected with the insect than are predatory birds or parasites.
第二段“may be”---Recent work suggests that this agent may be a virus。
最后一段One of the attractions of this hypothesis is its broad applicability.
rc
错选b
不仅仅是present evidence to refute一个观点,主要是present一个新观点a hypothesis
文章主要目的 (主旨题)
A(介绍新技术的发展,这种新技术能够帮助决定影响Lepidoptera数量cycle的driving force,文章并不是为了介绍新技术)
B(present证据来反驳一个关于Lepidoptera数量cycle的driving force的理论,无反驳,而是自己提出了一个假设)
C(present一个假设)
D(介绍Lepidoptera的数量cycle波动的模式,只有一句话提到)
E(质疑一个idea,那个idea认为只有一个driving force)
A选项:文章的主要目的是找出population circle fluctuation的原因,借助了新技术,但是不是主要目的;
B选项:并没有否定关于人口圈推动力的特殊的理论,Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses are hypothesized to be the driving force behind,指出真正的driving force;
C选项:文章的主要目的是找出population circle fluctuation的原因,提出一种假设Recent work suggests that this agent may be a virus.
D选项:文章确实提到 exhibit regularly recurring patterns of population growth and decline—such fluctuations in population are known as population cycles.但是并不是作为主要写作目的,而是指出问题,然后解决问题的目的;
第一段论点:a regular pattern such as a population cycle seems to imply a dominant, driving force (control the fluctuation of population circle), 然后指出研究上很困难,has proved surprisingly elusive despite considerable research,并介绍两种方式,效果都不好。
第二段论点:提出一种假设,this agent may be a virus,然后展开假设的过程,并说明假设的依据,中途感染,怎样感染其它毛毛虫;
补充 第三段开头就提到假设,主旨再次被提起
定位:第一段段末,病毒可能是影响population cycle的原因,第二段全面就在讨论病毒,显然病毒是作者提出的一个假设
主旨题,一个现象----提出假设