Although Alice Walker published a number of essays, poetry collections, and stories during the 1970s, her third novel, The Color Purple, which was published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim in that it won both the National Book Award as well as the Pulitzer Prize.
which was published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim in that it won both the National Book Award as well as the Pulitzer Prize
published in 1982, bringing her the widest acclaim by winning both the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize
published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim, winning both the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize
was published in 1982 and which, winning both the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize, brought her the widest acclaim
was published in 1982, winning both the National Book Award as well as the Pulitzer Prize, and bringing her the widest acclaim
题目分析:
由于过去分词和过去时长的很像,请千万不要把本题中(B)(C)两个选项中的过去分词published误认为是谓语动词。判断方式非常简单,只要是在逻辑上和主语是被动关系,但在身前却没有be动词的,都是过去分词而不是谓语动词的过去时。
选项分析:
A选项:本选项具有语法错误:both...and…是固定搭配,不能用both…as well as…;另外,请注意,连词in that(in that和because意思相近,都是因为的意思)是没有错误的,在GMAT的官方考题的正确选项中出现过,因此万万不可因为不熟悉in that而排除本选项。
B选项:本选项中published是过去分词,bringing是现在分词,这导致了主句没有谓语动词,可以直接排除。
C选项:Correct. 本选项在逻辑上和语法上均是正确的。
D选项:and后的which是一个定语从句,由于在and前没有出现定语从句,所以which没有平行的对象。关于and的平行问题,参考“功能平行”。
E选项:both…and…固定搭配错误同(A);本选项中现在分词短语winning both the National Book Award是was published的伴随状语,依图形背景原则可知,若本选项正确,则“赢得奖项”和“带来最广泛的称赞”的持续时间必然长于“出版于1982”这个事件。在逻辑上,“赢得奖项”和“带来最广泛的称赞”实际上是一个瞬间完成的事件(例如赢得奖项吧,在瞬间赢得奖项后,会获得“持有奖项”这个状态,即,持有奖项会持续很长时间,但是赢得奖项只有一瞬间。),而“被出版于1982年”则是一个持续到无穷远的状态(在1982年书出版后,它就会一直具有“出版于1982年”这个状态)。因此,publish这个动作应该用做从句,bring这个动作应该用做主句。
如OG114题,Which was known as又是正确选项。请解释一下这个考点在两题的区别
已经更新在114题中了
终于理解过去分词的使用条件。谢谢
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
按照E选项的解释,C选项里的赢得奖项是不是也该放到主句中?
Split#1:both...and...固定搭配,去掉选项A、E
Split#2:Sentence Struture: 选项B没有谓语,选项D中and前后不平行,去掉选项B、D
A:both and固定用法错误
B:缺少谓语
C: correct
D:and之后的定从缺少并列对象
E:both and 固定用法错误
知识点没有问题,毕老师讲得很清楚,只是关于in that,原句中的意思是由于获得两个奖项才使得她有广泛的知名度。假设原句仅仅表达语义(GMAC 经常通过错句来infer 其方向),那正确答案中的Verbing 的modifier "winning......" 是表达其前面获得广泛赞许的effect- 那这是不是说明先获得了赞许在获得的奖项? 当然我的假设是建立在原句(错误A) 表达语义正确的情况下才产生的疑问。
We've had some great discussion on this already, but let's see if we can break down HOW to answer this question in the quickest and easiest way we can! Before we dive in, here is the original question with the main differences between each option highlighted in orange:
Although Alice Walker published a number of essays, poetry collections, and stories during the 1970s, her third novel, The Color Purple, which was published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim in that it won both the National Book Award as well as the Pulitzer Prize.
(A) which was published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim in that it won both the National Book Award as well as the Pulitzer Prize
(B) published in 1982, bringing her the widest acclaim by winning both the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize
(C) published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim, winning both the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize
(D) was published in 1982 and which, winning both the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize, brought her the widest acclaim
(E) was published in 1982, winning both the National Book Award as well as the Pulitzer Prize, and bringing her the widest acclaim
After taking a quick glance over the options, a few key differences stand out:
1. which was published / was published / published
2. and / as well as
3. brought / bringing
The best place to start is anything that will knock out either 2 or 3 answers right away, so let's work our way backwards on our list and start with #3: brought vs. bringing. This is clearly an issue with verbs, so let's determine which one is the best to use here.
To begin, we need to find the subject and verb. Here is the original sentence:
Although Alice Walker published a number of essays, poetry collections, and stories during the 1970s, her third novel, The Color Purple, which was published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim in that it won both the National Book Award as well as the Pulitzer Prize.
If we cross out all of the modifiers (and there are a few), we're left with this:
Although Alice Walker published a number of essays, poetry collections, and stories during the 1970s, her third novel, The Color Purple, which was published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim in that it won both the National Book Award as well as the Pulitzer Prize.
Once you take out the modifiers, which are mainly there to confuse readers, it's clear that the subject of the sentence is "The Color Purple." And what did The Color Purple do? It brought Alice Walker acclaim! Let's look over each option more carefully to figure out which ones use the right verb to match the subject. I'll still cross out any modifiers to help you see things more clearly.
(A) The Color Purple, which was published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim in that it won both the National Book Award as well as the Pulitzer Prize --> OK
(B) The Color Purple, published in 1982, bringing her the widest acclaim by winning both the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize --> WRONG
("The Color Purple bringing" isn't the right verb.)
(C) The Color Purple, published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim, winning both the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize --> OK
(D) The Color Purple, was published in 1982 and which, winning both the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize, brought her the widest acclaim --> WRONG
(While this does use the correct verb "brought," it also tries to add another verb "was published" inside a modifier, which is a big no-no because it creates a comma splice! So, let's rule this one out too.)
(E) The Color Purple, was published in 1982, winning both the National Book Award as well as the Pulitzer Prize, and bringing her the widest acclaim --> WRONG
(This one is wrong because it uses the incorrect "bringing" and it has a comma splice before "was published.")
We can eliminate options B, D, & E because they use the wrong verbs or have comma splices. Now that we're left with only 2 options to choose from, let's tackle #2 on our list: as well as vs. and.
Whenever we see the word "both" joining two objects, those two objects MUST be joined by the word and:
Both X and Y = CORRECT
Both X as well as Y = WRONG
(A) which was published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim in that it won both the National Book Award as well as the Pulitzer Prize
(C) published in 1982, brought her the widest acclaim, winning both the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize
There you go - option C is the correct choice because it uses the correct verb "brought" and uses the idiom "both X and Y" correctly!
当你坚持要刷屏时,整个屏都是你的
厉害了👍
谢谢,但是把原题又誊抄一遍看起来很凌乱
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
B的两个动词都是分词,导致成分不完整
A选项:本选项具有语法错误:both...and…是固定搭配,不能用both…as well as…;另外,请注意,连词in that(in that和because意思相近,都是因为的意思)是没有错误的,在GMAT的官方考题的正确选项中出现过,因此万万不可因为不熟悉in that而排除本选项。
although 表转折,连词
although clause,+整句,her third novel, modifier, bought her the wide......才是个完整的句子
在时间轴上持续时间长的事件必然是更大的事件,即,背景事件;在时间轴上持续时间短的事件必然是更小的事件,即,图形事件。
E选项的bring影响更大,不做bringing伴随
同类的主次要分清
sc
句子的结构完整性,排除法;
b句子结构不完整
在时间轴上持续时间长的事件必然是更大的事件,即,背景事件(published,winning);在时间轴上持续时间短的事件必然是更小的事件,即,图形事件(brought)
因此,从句(或者分词短语等非谓语动词引导的短语)需要在时间上延续的更长,主句需要在时间上延续的更短。例如:
(1) Studying Chinese, people felt hard.
(2) **Feeling hard, people studied Chinese.
E中关于伴随状语的解释
and后的which是一个定语从句,由于在and前没有出现定语从句,所以which没有平行的对象。关于and的平行问题,参考“功能平行”。
Which was published不如直接published简洁,A排——B后面是是bringing根本就不是完整的句子,B排———C的结构是brought.....,ving完整,保留———D:and which直接排———E并列的逻辑不对———选C
B没有谓语
另外,请注意,连词in that(in that和because意思相近,都是因为的意思)是没有错误的,在GMAT的官方考题的正确选项中出现过,因此万万不可因为不熟悉in that而排除本选项。
in that因为
i!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! in that = because!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1.語意邏輯上 沒有太明顯差別
2.絕對考點:1. both A and B 2. sentence fragment 缺"謂" >刪ABE
3. and which 往前沒找到可平行從句!
3.C選項,質疑,主動詞中間有兩個插入句,但是並非文法對錯問題 ,只是相對考點> 還是選C