Unlike the automobile company, whose research was based on crashes involving sport utility vehicles, the research conducted by the insurance company took into account such factors as a driver’s age, sex, and previous driving record.
company, whose research was based on
company, which researched
company, in its research of
company’s research, having been based on
company’s research on
在D当中,你要考虑更多因素,怎么可能研究的基础还不同呢?这明显是不合逻辑的。而E就很好的解决了这个矛盾,并且其逻辑更加合理。
会引起歧义
会引起歧义
C选项having been based on是伴随状语,修饰最近的动作,最近的动作为took into account 主语为the research conducted by the insurance company 。显然是不合理的,因为这个having been based on逻辑上是企图描述前方的 the automobile company’s research
E选项正确
比较对象对等
Unlike A, who do B, C do D.这个结构里通常要求do B和do C构成unlike的点。
A,Unlike the automobile company‘s research, based on crashes, the research took into account such factors as a driver’s age, sex, and previous driving record.
研究考虑司机的年龄、性别、驾驶记录与研究建立在碰撞的基础上没法unlike,要unlike的话是:另一家公司将研究建立在B基础上。
而且从常识理解,他们为啥考虑司机的年龄、性别、驾驶记录?为了研究。所以改成unlike the research on crashes,关于碰撞的研究,ok
D,having been based on表示先时性,不像A的研究,已经以撞车为基础,B的研究考虑了其他的。
E,不像A的关于汽车碰撞的研究,B的研究考虑了其他的。ok
同时,紧跟名词的comma+ing除了可以做定语修饰名词,还有充当伴随状语的歧义。
D:having been based on VS based on
我也觉得这个having been done的被动不能修饰company登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
不需要完全平行,句意上能表达出合适的对比关系即可登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论