Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.
The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that
serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists
因果
科学家是受伟大研究而驱动的,并且只视以此为驱动力的工作者为同仁。
如果一位科学家被誉为普及者,那么他也就不再是科学家的同仁了。
Assu,增强因果联系
A、科学研究需要合作,无关
B、科学家不会将自己的敌人视为同仁,无关
C、一位没做过完整研究的科学家也可以成为popularizer,做没做过完整研究与受什么驱动无关
D、被认为是popularizer的科学家不再motivated to do important new research,不再这样,也就不再被视为同仁了,CORRECT
E、不是科学家的人不能接触或准确评价important new research,无关(与同仁无关)
解释类型题:
其实就是找出A推B中间缺失的内容
某一个科学家出名了 --------> 其他科学家就不把他当作自己的同事了
中间缺失:他们认为出名了的科学家就不会把精力放在科研上了
C:注意can
can咋了?
忘了
我好像只是写个备注提醒下自己
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
架桥思维。首先提到“科学家的目标是doing new research,且接受拥有相同目标的人为同事。” 后来提到:“科学普及者不被同事们认为是科学家。”这两点之间应该加一个桥让逻辑更加完整,即“科学普及者的最终目标不是doing new research。”
【注意题意】科学家抱着做研究的目的进入科学领域,并且只会接受那些有相同志向的人做同事,因此当一个科学家拿奖了,【Conclusion】其他人都认为这个人就不应该被当成是同事了
d, 补出了中间的gap: 拿奖的科学家没有动力再去做新研究了
错选c, 一个科学家可以在不完成重要的研究的情况下依然成为一个流行人物。这个和结论没关系!
科学家抱着做研究的目的进入科学领域,并且只会接受那些有相同志向的人做同事,因此当一个科学家拿奖了,其他人都认为这个人就不应该被当成是同事了
choice d, 补出了中间的gap: 拿奖的科学家没有动力再去做新研究了
choice c, 一个科学家可以在不完成重要的研究的情况下依然成为一个流行人物。 out of scope, 不能脑补那些得奖的科学家正属于这种情况
no longer a true colleague; new research 所以不选C
假设题
A 科学研究是一个集体的合作 这和结论没关系
B 嫉妒?看不出来
C 怎么成为popular。和其他科学家的认为无关
D 如果这些人不去做新实验。和原文第一句话形成联系
E 无关
很明显D选项更贴切...为啥我会选E...
①scientists enter the field with the goal==》
②scientist认为他的colleague也是有这样的goal的
结论:当一个科学家expound science to 普通大众,那么其他科学家就认为这个科学家不是colleague了
很显然:相同goal==》colleague
expound science to general audiences==》不是colleague
expound science to general audiences==》不相同的goal
should no longer be regarded as a true colleague 因为是no longer所以说明是以后的事情符合d选项的do important new research
c选项是说从来没有做出过成果
motivation
这道题是linke the gap
colleague --> doing important research.
scientist wins renown --> not a true colleague
链接gap:
Not a true colleague --> not doing important research. 答案D
原文讲的是true colleague和doing important research之间的关系,和是不是科学家没有关系啊。E属于无关选项。
这道题是linke the gap
colleague --> doing important research.
scientist wins renown --> not a true colleague
链接gap:
Not a true colleague --> not doing important research. 答案D
原文讲的是true colleague和doing important research之间的关系,和是不是科学家没有关系啊。E属于无关选项。
“Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. ”这个是重点,E 偏离了
accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation
this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.
接受有相同motivation的人,现在不接受了,就说明不具有相同的motivation了,选D
学家认为the goal of doing important new research的人是他们的同事,那么现在科学家认为popularizer不是他们的colleague,推出科学家认为popularizer已经不做important new research