Political Advertisement: Mayor Delmont's critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont's leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but each year since Delmont took office the average pay for the new jobs created has been higher than that year's average pay for jobs citywide. So it stands to reason that throughout Delmont's tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument in the advertisement?
The unemployment rate in the city is higher today than it was when Mayor Delmont took office.
The average pay for jobs in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
Each year during Mayor Delmont's tenure, the average pay for jobs that were eliminated has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide.
Most of the jobs eliminated during Mayor Delmont's tenure were in declining industries.
The average pay for jobs in the city is currently lower than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.
试着想想马云马化腾的工作被移除了 平均值的变化
B 一个10年的低水平,不能削弱。毕竟也是在这个水平上好了一些
C 新工作的平均工资比去除的就工作低。削弱了情况变好的结论。明明是大家得到的钱逗比以前少了。
A过去三年平均工资,无关
B十年内最低,无关
C原工资平均值>含新工作后平均值,削弱
1 1 4 10(平均值4) 1 1 4 6 6(平均值3.6)
D衰退行业,无关
E城市平均工资比郊区高,无关
因果推理:
因:jobs created has been higher than that year's average pay for jobs citywide
果: average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.
C削弱结论,高工资已经被排除了