In 1971 researchers hoping to predict earthquakes in the short term by identifying precursory phenomena (those that occur a few days before large quakes but not otherwise) turned their attention to changes in seismic waves that had been detected prior to earthquakes. An explanation for such changes was offered by "dilatancy theory," based on a well-known phenomenon observed in rocks in the laboratory: as stress builds, microfractures in rock close, decreasing the rock's volume. But as stress continues to increase, the rock begins to crack and expand in volume, allowing groundwater to seep in, weakening the rock. According to this theory, such effects could lead to several precursory phenomena in the field, including a change in the velocity of seismic waves, and an increase in small, nearby tremors.

Researchers initially reported success in identifying these possible precursors, but subsequent analyses of their data proved disheartening. Seismic waves with unusual velocities were recorded before some earthquakes, but while the historical record confirms that most large earthquakes are preceded by minor tremors, these foreshocks indicate nothing about the magnitude of an impending quake and are indistinguishable from other minor tremors that occur without large earthquakes.

In the 1980s, some researchers turned their efforts from short-term to long-term prediction. Noting that earthquakes tend to occur repeatedly in certain regions, Lindh and Baker attempted to identify patterns of recurrence, or earthquake cycles, on which to base predictions. In a study of earthquake-prone sites along the San Andreas Fault, they determined that quakes occurred at intervals of approximately 22 years near one site and concluded that there was a 95 percent probability of an earthquake in that area by 1992. The earthquake did not occur within the time frame predicted, however.

Evidence against the kind of regular earthquake cycles that Lindh and Baker tried to establish has come from a relatively new field, paleoseismology. Paleoseismologists have unearthed and dated geological features such as fault scarps that were caused by earthquakes thousands of years ago. They have determined that the average interval between ten earthquakes that took place at one site along the San Andreas Fault in the past two millennia was 132 years, but individual intervals ranged greatly, from 44 to 332 years.


The passage is primarily concerned with


explaining why one method of earthquake prediction has proven more practicable than an alternative method

suggesting that accurate earthquake forecasting must combine elements of long-term and short-term prediction

challenging the usefulness of dilatancy theory for explaining the occurrence of precursory phenomena

discussing the deficiency of two methods by which researchers have attempted to predict the occurrence of earthquakes

describing the development of methods for establishing patterns in the occurrence of past earthquakes

考题讲解

此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。

正确答案是 D. 该文章讨论了研究人员在尝试预测地震发生的过程中用的两种方法的不足之处。文章最初提出的短期预测方法(例如,观察和记录地震前出现的先兆现象)并没有取得成功,因为相关数据分析显示,有些地震之前有不寻常的速度被记录,但这些前兆无法表明即将发生的地震的大小。随后,文章提出了进行长期预测的方法,但这也没有取得成功,因为新发现的古地震学证据表明古历史上同一地区每次地震之间的平均间隔是132年,但间隔有时会超出44-332年的范围。因此,答案是 D. 讨论两种研究人员尝试预测地震发生的方法的不足之处。

展开显示

登录注册 后可以参加讨论

OG2018V-RC