Exactly when in the early modern era Native Americans began exchanging animal furs with Europeans for European-made goods is uncertain. What is fairly certain, even though they left no written evidence of having done so, is that the first Europeans to conduct such trade during the modern period were fishing crews working the waters around Newfoundland. Archaeologists had noticed that sixteenth-century Native American sites were strewn with iron bolts and metal pins. Only later, upon reading Nicolas Denys's 1672 account of seventeenth-century European settlements in North America, did archaeologists realize that sixteenth-century European fishing crews had dismantled and exchanged parts of their ships for furs.
  By the time Europeans sailing the Atlantic coast of North America first documented the fur trade, it was apparently well underway. The first to record such trade—the captain of a Portuguese vessel sailing from Newfoundland in 1501—observed that a Native American aboard the ship wore Venetian silver earrings. Another early chronicler noted in 1524 that Native Americans living along the coast of what is now New England had become selective about European trade goods: they accepted only knives, fishhooks, and sharp metal. By the time Cartier sailed the Saint Lawrence River ten years later, Native Americans had traded with Europeans for more than thirty years, perhaps half a century.


Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about evidence pertaining to the fur trade between Native Americans and Europeans in the early modern era?


A lack of written evidence has made it difficult to establish which Europeans first participated in this trade.

In general, the physical evidence pertaining to this trade has been more useful than the written evidence has been.

There is more written evidence pertaining to this trade from the early part of the sixteenth century than from later in that century.

The earliest written evidence pertaining to this trade dates from a time when the trade was already well established.

Some important pieces of evidence pertaining to this trade, such as Denys's 1672 account, were long overlooked by archaeologists.

考题讲解

此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。


正确答案是 B。 从文章中可以推断出,在早期现代时期,关于原住民与欧洲人之间的毛皮贸易,物理证据要比书面证据更有用。文中指出,当考古学家们发现16世纪在原住民现场四处到处都是铁铆钉、金属钉时,只有当他们读到尼古拉·丹尼斯在1672年贴出关于17世纪欧洲在北美建立殖民地的记载时,他们才意识到16世纪的欧洲捕鱼船队已经拆除船舶的部分,以毛皮换取。因此,这一物理证据显然比书面证据更有用。

展开显示

登录注册 后可以参加讨论

OG2018V-RC