Child development specialists believe that, in confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited.
that, in confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited
that, in their confinement much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers, muscle development can be inhibited in babies
that confining babies much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can inhibit muscle development
that babies, if confined much of the time to strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can inhibit muscle development
that strollers, high chairs, playpens, and walkers can, if babies are confined to the much of the time, result in muscle development being inhibited
为什么是confine babies much of the time 而不是 babies' 呢?求解答
还是句意理解不到位
注意到底是什么阻止肌肉发展!!!!
high chairs, playpens, and walkers是一个并列词组……
断句断错了。。愚蠢
看了一圈 终于看到一个 像样的回复 来自马儿得得
剩下的一群乱说的同学建议你们去看看helr老师的书
ab的错误都是in 因为in是表示状语 只是相关的关系 而句子明显想表达的是因果
d baby自己限制自己发展?
e 在瞎说什么呢 懒得看了
A选项:介词in confining babies有问题;
B选项:代词their指代不明确,距离所指代的词太运
C选项:限制行为能阻碍肌肉发展
D选项:主语babies, can inhibit...语意出问题
E选项:that 后面的几个物体无法导致限制的后果,与文意不符
A initial modifier(-ing): muscle in confining.. (>>> objects in confining) ( INCORRECT)
B pronoun: their -- directly to scientist ( INCORRECT)
D babies can inhibit.. ( INCORRECT)
E babies are confined to time ( INCORRECT)
1-A和B,in 引导的介词短语做状语,修饰谓语can,句意想表达是通过一种方式,而不是in这种类似方位和范围的表述;排除;
2-D,宝宝自己不会主动去抑制自己的肌肉发展的,主被动表述有问题,排除;
3-E这是什么奇怪的句子,瞥一眼就直接排除;
选C
想问一下d选项,if confined这里是伴随状语吧,应该是一个被动,这样子的话为什么D不对呢
就算是伴随状语,句子的主语是 baby。baby 能抑制肌肉发展。不合理吧。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论