Most attempts by physicists to send particles faster than the speed of light involve a remarkable phenomenon called quantum tunneling, in which particles travel through solid barriers that appear to be impenetrable. If you throw a ball at a wall, you expect it to bounce back, not to pass straight through it. Yet subatomic particles perform the equivalent feat. Quantum theory says that there is a distinct, albeit small, probability that such a particle will tunnel its way through a barrier; the probability declines exponentially as the thickness of the barrier increases. Though the extreme rapidity of quantum tunneling was noted as early as 1932, not until 1955 was it hypothesized—by Wigner and Eisenbud—that tunneling particles sometimes travel faster than light. Their grounds were calculations that suggested that the time it takes a particle to tunnel through a barrier increases with the thickness of the barrier until tunneling time reaches a maximum; beyond that maximum, tunneling time stays the same regardless of barrier thickness. This would imply that once maximum tunneling time is reached, tunneling speed will increase without limit as barrier thickness increases. Several recent experiments have supported this hypothesis that tunneling particles sometimes reach superluminal speed. According to measurements performed by Raymond Chiao and colleagues, for example, photons can pass through an optical filter at 1.7 times the speed of light.


The author of the passage mentions calculations about tunneling time and barrier thickness in order to


suggest that tunneling time is unrelated to barrier thickness

explain the evidence by which Wigner and Eisenbud discovered the phenomenon of tunneling

describe data recently challenged by Raymond Chiao and colleagues

question why particles engaged in quantum tunneling rarely achieve extremely high speeds

explain the basis for Wigner and Eisenbud's hypothesis

考题讲解

文章大意:

现象:量子隧道效应

具体:一个粒子穿过障碍物,障碍物越厚,可能性越小。

→ 1955的发现:假设了量子比光快

假设基于:障碍物越厚,穿墙时间越长,长到一定程度,就不变了;而速度会无限增加。

题目分析:

文章推断题:文章提到关于时间和厚度的计算是为了?

选项分析:

A选项:证明时间和厚度无关:文章已经说明他们是有关的。

B选项:解释W&E发现量子现象的证据:W&E是基于计算得出的结论,而不是通过这个计算发现了量子的现象。

C选项:描述最近被R&C质疑的数据:原文没有提。

D选项:
质疑为什么量子隧道效应里的粒子很少达到高速:原文没有提。

E选项:正确。
解释W&E的假设基础:原文说了他们的基础是计算,这个计算说明了随着厚度增加穿行时间也增加,直到达到最大值。

展开显示

登录注册 后可以参加讨论

OG2019-RC