According to a recent study, retirees in the United States are four times more likely to give regular financial aid to their children as to receive it from them.
retirees in the United States are four times more likely to give regular financial aid to their children as
retirees in the United States are four times as likely to give regular financial aid to their children as it is for them
retirees in the United States are four times more likely to give regular financial aid to their children than
it is four times more likely for retirees in the United States to give regular financial aid to their children than they are
it is four times as likely that retirees in the United States will give their children regular financial aid as they are
题目分析:根据最近的研究,美国的退休人员给他们的孩子经济援助的可能性是接受孩子的经济援助的可能性的四倍
本题主要考察了比较
选项分析:
A选项:比较 要不然是“more...than...”,要不然是“as...as...” 没有more...as...的搭配。
B选项:这个选项用了as...as...的搭配,但是第一个as后面是“give aid”,即谓语宾语成分,但第二个as后面是完整的一句话,成分并不对等。
C选项:正确
D选项:it在这里是形式主语,指代“美国退休人员给孩子们经济援助”这一件事,此时就变成了“这件事是有可能的”;than 后面是“退休人员有可能接受援助”,此时变成了“退休人员有可能去干嘛干嘛”。很明显,并不能“一件事”和“一群人”比较。
E选项:同D
d的问题是for retirees 这个是为了retirees的意思 作状语 这是有问题的 但e不懂哪里错啊
e比较对象不正确。it is likely that中的it是形式主语,指代that后面的一整句话,那么整句话的意思就是:“retirees give children aid这件事" is four times as likely as “retirees” are likely to do sth
茅塞顿开 谢谢老师
老师,“retirees give children aid这件事" is four times as likely as “retirees” are likely to do sth 我怎么觉得这两个比较没问题呢?
retirees give 这件事 as likely as retirees to do
retires will give和 they are不平行
(That retirees in the united status will give their children regular financial aid) is four times as likely as (they are) to receive it from them. 比较的对象是that从句与they (retirees)
多谢
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论