扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / OG2020-CR-610
Arts advocate: Few universities require that students who are specializing in science and technology take many art courses. However, real progress in science and technology requires an element of creativity, which the arts foster. Thus, to help science and technology students succeed in their careers, universities should increase the number of art courses required for them.
Which of the following would, if true, most strengthen the argument above?
Universities required more art courses for science and technology students in the past.
Participation in art courses increases students' creative thinking in their science and technology courses.
More students who are interested in art would specialize in science and technology if the number of art courses required for those programs were increased.
Some of the most prominent scientists began their careers as artists.
Discussion of science and technology topics in art courses increases creative thinking among students in those courses.
情景：Art advocate：很少有大学会要求科技专业的学生上艺术课。但是，科技需要创造力。所以，为了让学科技的学生能有成功的职业生涯，大学应该增加他们必修艺术课的数量。
推理：
方案：增加必修艺术课的数量
目标：帮助科技专业的学生有成功的职业生涯。
选项分析：
A选项：过去，大学要求科技学生有上更多的艺术课：与过去如何无关。
B选项：正确。参加艺术课程会提高学生在科技课上的创造力思维：取非后，是参加艺术课程不会提高学生在科技课上的创造力思维。既然不能提高，那么这个方案就不能达到目标，属于方案可行性问题。
C选项：如果科技专业要求的艺术课数量增加，更多对艺术感兴趣的学生会学科技：没有讨论艺术对科技专业学生的帮助。
D选项：一些最杰出的科学家开始他们作为艺术家的职业生涯：和方案无关。
E选项：在艺术课上讨论科技问题可以提高那些课程的学生的创造性思维：我们讨论的是艺术对科技专业学生的帮助，而不是科技对艺术的帮助。
好家伙，两次都做对的，第三次错了...
B选项还真的是额外premise，题目说需要创造性的元素，B选项说是创造性的思考，因此能够对科学技术职业生涯提供帮助
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论