扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / OG2020-CR-613
Harunia Province has a relatively dry climate and is attracting a fast-growing population that has put increasing demands on its water supply. The two companies that supply water to the region have struggled to keep up with demand and still remain profitable. Yet now they are asking Harunian authorities to write residential water-use regulations that could reduce their revenues and restrict their future flexibility in supplying water profitably.
Which of the following would, if true, most logically help explain why the water- supply companies are asking the authorities to regulate residential water use?
The companies are planning large water-transportation and irrigation systems that require the approval of neighboring provinces.
The companies believe regulation is inevitable and that having it in place now will allow better planning and thus future profitability.
Few, if any, Harunian government officials have investments in the companies or serve on their boards of directors.
The companies believe that the population is not likely to continue to grow.
Long-term climate projections suggest that greater rainfall will eventually increase the amount of water available.
情景：H省极度干燥，并且人口快速增长，导致对水的需求增长。两个供应水的公司发愁水的供应并且依旧保持盈利。但是呢，他们跑去和政府说，你们颁布个居民用水条款吧。这个条款会降低供水公司的收入并限制他们未来在盈利供水的灵活性。
题目让我们解释一下为啥这两个公司会这么做。
推理：这个属于现象解释型题目。因为顺序的推理应该是：
因为条款会降低收入并且限制他们的供水灵活性，
所以他们不会主动要求实施这个条款。
我们要对这个逻辑链进行削弱。
选项分析：
A选项：这俩公司在计划大型水运输和灌溉系统，这些系统需要隔壁省的同意：无法解释为什么这个条款明显对他们不利但还是要做。
B选项：正确。这俩公司相信这个条款是无法避免的，并且现在就定好了有利于计划未来：既然注定要发生，不如早点发生我们还能早点计划下一步，未雨绸缪。
C选项：很少的政府机构在这俩公司有投资或者服务于他们的董事会：无法解释为什么这个条款明显对他们不利但还是要做。
D选项：这俩公司相信人口不会继续增长了：依旧无法解释为什么这个条款明显对他们不利但还是要做。
E选项：长期的气候项目认为，强降雨将会增加可用水的量：如果将来会有更多可用水，那供水公司更不应该要求实施此条款了。
A not B, 所以解释，这一点理解；
但是， 这个属于6大类的哪一类？ 因果关系吗，按什么CQ解题
我一开始定为因果推理
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论