Economist: In 2015, the average per-person amount paid for goods and services purchased by consumers in Country X was the equivalent of $17,570 in United States dollars, just 30 percent of the corresponding figure of $58,566 for Country Y. Yet in 2015, there was already a substantial middle class in Country X that had discretionary income for middle-class consumer goods such as new vehicles, computers, or major household appliances, while a significant portion of the middle class in Country Y did not have sufficient income to purchase such items.
Which of the following, if true, most helps explain the discrepancy in the relationships described by the economist?
There are many consumer goods, such as household appliances, that are produced inCountry X to be sold in the Country Y market.
The volume of trade between Country X and Country Y is increasing rapidly in both directions.
The economy of Country Y is recovering from a downturn that affected both Country Y and Country X.
Country X residents pay much less than their Country Y counterparts for housing, transportation, and child care.
In Country Y as well as in Country X, there are few assembly-line jobs in factories that pay a middle-class wage.
情景:2015年的时候,X国的人均goods & service消费为17570刀, 只是Y国的三分之一(Y国为58566刀)。但是,2015年的时候,已经有不少的X国中产阶级在购买中产阶级产品,比如汽车电脑家电等等,而相当一部分Y国的中产阶级就没有这个闲钱了。
推理:此题为现象解释题型,顺序的逻辑推理应该是
(因):因为人均g&s消费和中产阶级购买中产阶级产品有关系
(果):所以人均g&s消费低的X国,中产阶级购买中产阶级产品的消费也低。
对此推理进行削弱。
选项分析:
A选项:有许多在X国生产的消费品,如家电,被卖到了Y国市场:与在哪里生产哪里售卖无关。
B选项:两国的交易量快速增加:依旧无法解释人均g&s消费和中产阶级购买中产阶级产品的关系。
C选项:Y国的经济正在从一场影响两国的低迷时期恢复:并不知道恢复到什么水平,以及是否有能力购买中产阶级产品。
D选项:正确。X国的居民在房子,交通,育儿上比Y国同等阶级的人花更少的钱:这个解释了为什么X国的人有“闲钱”买中产阶级产品,因为他们在别的地方花的少。
E选项:在两国,很少的流水线工作会支付中产工资:无关。
这不是一个类比推理咩
支持
应该是相当于反过来的枚举吧
我也觉得是类比。证明X和Y不是完全可比,所以选D
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论