Linda Kerber argued in the mid-1980s that after the American Revolution (1775–1783), an ideology of “republican motherhood” resulted in a surge of educational opportunities for women in the United States. Kerber maintained that the leaders of the new nation wanted women to be educated in order to raise politically virtuous sons. A virtuous citizenry was considered essential to the success of the country’s republican form of government; virtue was to be instilled not only by churches and schools, but by families, where the mother’s role was crucial. Thus, according to Kerber, motherhood became pivotal to the fate of the republic, providing justification for an unprecedented attention to female education.
Introduction of the “republican motherhood” thesis dramatically changed historiography. Prior to Kerber’s work, educational historians barely mentioned women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929 work is the notable exception. Examining newspaper advertisements for academies, Woody found that educational opportunities increased for both girls and boys around 1750. Pointing to “An Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting a shift in view, Woody also claimed that practical education for females had many advocates before the Revolution. Woody’s evidence challenges the notion that the Revolution changed attitudes regarding female education, although it may have accelerated earlier trends. Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “republican motherhood” thesis may have obscured the presence of these trends, making it difficult to determine to what extent the Revolution really changed women’s lives.
According to the passage, Kerber maintained that which of the following led to an increase in educational opportunities for women in the United States after the American Revolution?
An unprecedented demand by women for greater educational opportunities in the decades following the Revolution
A new political ideology calling for equality of opportunity between women and men in all aspects of life
A belief that the American educational system could be reformed only if women participated more fully in that system
A belief that women needed to be educated if they were to contribute to the success of the nation’s new form of government
A recognition that women needed to be educated if they were to take an active role in the nation’s schools and churches
文章大意:
LK观点:美国独立战争(revolution)后,女性受教育的重要性↑。原因:和教堂学校一样,培养有政治觉悟的男人
LK之前,很少有人提女性。
除了TW:1750年左右两性均受教育的机会↑ ; Revolution之前就支持女性受教育,Revolution只是加快了这个趋势。
所以,AR到底多大程度改变了女性的生活?
题目分析:
文章细节题:LK认为以下哪点增加了AR之后女性受教育的机会?
原文:LK认为国家的新领袖想让女性受教育,因为想借此增加有政治觉悟的男性;而善良的公民对新政府的顺利执政是很重要的;不仅仅教堂和学校传授美德,家庭也发挥着同样的作用,而母亲在家庭中又扮演着重要角色。
选项分析:
A选项:revolution之后,女性对受教育的前所未有的渴望:原文没提。
B选项:新的政治思想:男女在受教育方面应该平等:原文没有提。
C选项:有人相信:只有让女性更多的参与到教育系统中,教育系统才会革新:原文没有提到。
D选项:正确。有人相信:如果他们可以为国家新政府的执政做贡献,那她们应该受教育:原文提到,母亲在教育孩子方面功不可没,而教育出好的公民,对新政度执政有很大帮助。
E选项:有人认为:如果女性在学校和教堂里扮演着重要角色,那她们应该受教育:原文只是说母亲扮演的角色和教堂学校的角色同样重要,并不是说女性在教堂学校里工作。
有关A An unprecedented demand by women for greater educational opportunities in the decades following the Revolution 选项的重点是demand,
但对应回原文 a surge of educational opportunities for women ,是opportunities for ,demand和opportunity不是一个概念。