Linking arrangements among secondary schools and the workplace never evolved in the United States as they have in most other developed countries.
among secondary schools and the workplace never evolved in the United States as they have
in the United States among secondary schools and the workplace never evolved as they did
between secondary schools and the workplace never evolved in the United States as
in the United States between secondary schools and the workplace never evolved as they have
between secondary schools and the workplace never evolved in the United States as they did
题目分析:学校和工作之间的联系从来没有像在其他发达国家一样在美国发展。
选项分析:
A选项:在两者之间我们说“between A and B”;不能用among。
并且,as身后是“they have”,为“they have done sth”的省略,但as前面并没有完成时,即“have”出现,所以,as 后面出现完成时形式的省略是错误的。
B选项:使用among的错误同A。
in the United States放在arrangements之后,作定语,意为“在美国的、中学和工作间的 联系”;as之后的they也就指代了“在美国的联系”。但我们不能说“在美国的联系在别的国家发展”,应该是说“联系在美国发展 vs 联系在别的国家发展”,即做evolved的状语才合理。
C选项:as身后直接为“in the most other developed countries”这一状语,说明省略了主句部分,但前面的主句部分直接copy过来就成了“Linking arrangements between secondary schools and the workplace never evolved in the most other developed countries”。其字面意思为“学校和工作的联系在其他发达国家也从未发展”。但合理的意思应该是在美国没发展,但在别的国家发展了。
D选项:in the US做“联系”的定语错误同B;they have错误同A。
E选项:正确。they did为“they evolved”的省略,they指代“linking arrangements between secondary schools and the workplace ”。
they指代 linking xxx 这件事不奇异么,they不应该是复数指代么。
they 应该是指“linking arrangements”
linking在这里应该是做形容词吧
这一点我也有疑问,linking arrangements难道不是一个动名词做主语?还是说它只是一个adj?后面一种解释能够做对题,但是有点牵强,感觉像是我做错了,为了说服自己,或者没有其他更好的选项了,才这么理解的。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论