In the last few years, plant scientists have been able to genetically engineer seeds to produce crops highly resistant to insect damage. Farmers growing crops with these seeds will be able to spend significantly less on pesticides. This cost reduction would more than make up for the higher cost of the genetically engineered seeds. Clearly, therefore, farmers who grow crops from genetically engineered seeds will be able to reduce their costs by using them.
Which of the following. if true, most weakens the argument?
Plant scientists have not yet developed insect-resistant strains of every crop that is currently grown commercially.
The cost of several commonly used pesticides is expected to rise in the next few years.
Crops grown from the genetically engineered seeds require significantly more fertilizer and water to grow well than do crops grown from nonengineered seeds.
In the future, the cost of genetically engineered seeds is likely to fall to the level of nonengineered seeds.
The crops that now require the greatest expenditure on pesticides are not the ones for which genetically engineered seeds will become available.
因果论证:没有因果,一因多果,干扰因素【抓前提】
P:种新种子节省的杀虫剂钱>新种子额外的售价
C:种新种子节约成本
关注成本问题,前提里也是各种成本, 所以要关注花费。
A:无关
B:杀虫剂价格上涨。Strengthen
C:需要其他成本。干扰因素。【新种子钱+水肥钱>节省的钱】weaken
D:未来新种子价格会下降。【无关】
E:比较对象错误。而且能节省一点是一点,虽然最费农药的解决不了,但是其他的能省一点。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论