Proposal: Carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere block the escape of heat into space. So emission df these "greenhouse" gases contributes to global warming. In order to reduce global warming, emission of greenhouse gases needs to be reduced. Therefore, the methane now emitted from open landfills should instead be burned to produce electricity.
Objection: The burning of methane generates carbon dioxide that is released into the atmosphere.
Which of the following, if true, most adequately counters the objection made to the proposal?
Every time a human being or other mammal exhales, there is some carbon dioxide released into the air.
The conversion of methane to electricity would occur at a considerable distance from the landfills.
The methane that is used to generate electricity would generally be used as a substitute for a fuel that does not produce any greenhouse gases when burned.
Methane in the atmosphere is more effective in blocking the escape of heat from the Earth than is carbon dioxide.
The amount of methane emitted from the landfills could be reduced if the materials whose decomposition produces not discarded, but recycled.
这个题感觉不是很严谨,没有控制变量:加入甲烷与氧气燃烧反应全部生成二氧化碳的情况下,相同物质的量的甲烷比二氧化碳阻止热逃逸的效果更好。
原题的意思应该是单位量的甲烷保温效果更强,燃烧是一种化学变化,不会减少质量,再加上一些损耗,最终产生的二氧化碳的质量应该会更少
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论