It is an odd but indisputable fact that the seventeenth-century English women who are generally regarded as among the forerunners of modern feminism are almost all identified with the Royalist side in the conflict between Royalists and Parliamentarians known as the English Civil Wars. Since Royalist ideology is often associated with the radical patriarchalism of seventeenth-century political theorist Robert Filmer—a patriarchalism that equates family and kingdom and asserts the divinely ordained absolute power of the king and, by analogy, of the male head of the household—historians have been understandably puzzled by the fact that Royalist women wrote the earliest extended criticisms of the absolute subordination of women in marriage and the earliest systematic assertions of women's rational and moral equality with men. Some historians have questioned the facile equation of Royalist ideology with Filmerian patriarchalism; and indeed, there may have been no consistent differences between Royalists and Parliamentarians on issues of family organization and women's political rights, but in that case one would expect early feminists to be equally divided between the two sides.
Catherine Gallagher argues that Royalism engendered feminism because the ideology of absolute monarchy provided a transition to an ideology of the absolute self. She cites the example of the notoriously eccentric author Margaret Cavendish (1626–1673), duchess of Newcastle. Cavendish claimed to be as ambitious as any woman could be, but knowing that as a woman she was excluded from the pursuit of power in the real world, she resolved to be mistress of her own world, the "immaterial world" that any person can create within her own mind—and, as a writer, on paper. In proclaiming what she called her "singularity," Cavendish insisted that she was a self-sufficient being within her mental empire, the center of her own subjective universe rather than a satellite orbiting a dominant male planet. In justifying this absolute singularity, Cavendish repeatedly invoked the model of the absolute monarch, a figure that became a metaphor for the self-enclosed, autonomous nature of the individual person. Cavendish's successors among early feminists retained her notion of woman's sovereign self, but they also sought to break free from the complete political and social isolation that her absolute singularity entailed.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
trace the historical roots of a modern sociopolitical movement
present one scholar's explanation for a puzzling historical phenomenon
contrast two interpretations of the ideological origins of a political conflict
establish a link between the ideology of an influential political theorist and that of a notoriously eccentric writer
call attention to some points of agreement between opposing sides in an ideological debate
题目分析:
文章主旨题
选项分析:
A选项:追溯一个现代社会政治运动的历史根源:文章没有追溯根源,也没有提到“现代历史运动”。
B选项:正确。提出一个学者的解释,来解释一个令人困惑的历史现象:第一段讲了一个令人困惑的现象:保皇党女性批评父权主义;第二段提出了一种解释。
C选项:对比两种关于“某一个政治冲突的起源”的解释:文章并没有关注冲突的起源。
D选项:建立“有影响力的政治理论家的理论”和“臭名昭著的古怪的作家的理论”的联系:文章并没有试图建立两个人的关系。
E选项:强调辩论的双方观点的一致之处:尽管双方有一致的地方,但文章更多的是强调不同之处。
B选项:正确。提出一个学者(即第二段的Catherine Gallagher)的解释,来解释一个令人困惑的历史现象:第一段讲了一个令人困惑的现象:保皇党女性批评父权主义;第二段提出了一种解释。
rc
错,主旨题,文中没提,one word pass;!!!不要只读前三个词来选主旨题,注意陷阱!!!
a:没注意看就选了,其实没有仔细读到每一个词;modern sociopolitical movement ---one word pass,modern运动错误,文中没提,前半句对,但是后半句是坑,这种一眼看上去对的一定要注意每个词;
c“ origins,文中并没有解释冲突的起源
e:构想出如果是正确答案应该怎么写?明贤不对
b:提出一种现象的解释成因,一个scholar是谁,在文中Catherine Gallagher argues that Royalism。。。。
注意审题 这里的origin 是说两个冲突的起源 这里并没有提到与起源相关的内容
选B:present one scholar's explanation for a puzzling historical phenomenon
one scholar——Catherine Gallagher;
explanation——从absolute monarch推到absolute self(第二段);
a puzzling historical phenomenon——historians have been understandably puzzled by the fact that...(第一段)
第一段Royalist支持patriarchalism,拒了RF(theorist)的ideology,认为会削弱对feminism的支持,故而puzzle
第二段,CG认为Royalist还是可以产生feminism的,提出了一个例子:MC(notoriously eccentric writer)从absolute monarch推到absolute self的过程
所以不存在D中ideology和notoriously eccentric writer有link,二者虽然都是royalist,但是在根本上不相同,一体两面
错选D
第一段说女性主义与保皇党不搭嘎
第二段说女性主义与保皇党有很大关系 源于保皇党
所以两者不是link 不是agreement而是disagreement的关系
A选项:没提到
C选项:文章提到保皇派和议会派的政治冲突,但是并没有就其政治起源和对其的理解作为重点;
D选项:本文试图unlink这个理论家和一个作家,通过说明F的爱国主义不是唯一Royalist的指导思想, C提出了一个完全新的理解。主义对link一词的理解!!
E选项:都agree on皇权绝对地位,本文没有集中在agreement上,而是disagreement上,对于大的理论下女性在婚姻和政治社会地位的权利提出不一致看法,所以第二段CG这个人在写作中也是使用者绝对君主的思维的。
定位词:Catherine Gallagher
不要看到上文的historians误判这个选项只说了一个人,实际上第二段全文都在论述对上面历史学家困惑的解释。这作出这个解释的人就是开头提到的CG这个人
B,错选C,C说不同政治斗争;
注意要把选项读干净,警惕全半句都对的不要不要的,后面句逗你玩的题,长记性!