There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian populations and of extinctions of a number of the world's endangered amphibian species. These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this "amphibian crisis," which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.
To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored. A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one. An endangered population is always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of extinction even without a proximate cause in human activities. Its disappearance, however unfortunate, should come as no great surprise. Moreover, chance events—which may indicate nothing about the direction of trends in population size—may lead to its extinction. The probability of extinction due to such random factors depends on the population size and is independent of the prevailing direction of change in that size.
For biologists, population declines are potentially more worrisome than extinctions. Persistent declines, especially in large populations, indicate a changed ecological context. Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population). Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.
It is indisputably true that there is simply not enough long-term scientific data on amphibian populations to enable researchers to identify real declines in amphibian populations. Many fairly common amphibian species declared all but extinct after severe declines in the 1950s and 1960s have subsequently recovered, and so might the apparently declining populations that have generated the current appearance of an amphibian crisis. Unfortunately, longterm data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.
Which of the following most accurately describes the organization of the passage?
A question is raised, a distinction regarding it is made, and the question is answered.
An interpretation is presented, its soundness is examined, and a warning is given.
A situation is described, its consequences are analyzed, and a prediction is made.
Two interpretations of a phenomenon are described, and one of them is rejected as invalid.
Two methods for analyzing a phenomenon are compared, and further study of the phenomenon is recommended.
题目分析:
文章推断题:文章的组织结构是?
选项分析:
A选项:提出一个问题,提出它的差别,给出答案:如果问题是“claim对不对”,那么文章并没有给出明确的答案。
B选项:正确。提出一个解释,它的可信性被检测,然后给出警示:正确。文章先给出关于两栖动物数量下降的解释,然后评估它的准确性,最后警示不可以马后炮。
C选项:描述一个情景,分析它的结果,然后做了一个预测:如果情景是指两栖动物数量下降,那文章并没有分析它的结果,也没有做任何预测。
D选项:提出关于某个现象的两种解释,然后否定其中一个:文章没有否定任何一个解释。
E选项:对比分析某种现象的两种方法,然后建议深入调查:文章没有提到两种方法。
B选项:An interpretation is presented, its 【soundness(安定性;坚固性)】 is examined, and a warning is given.正确。提出一个解释,它的可信性被检测,然后给出警示:正确。文章先给出关于两栖动物数量下降的解释,然后评估它的准确性,最后警示不可以马后炮。
E选项:Two 【methods】 for analyzing a phenomenon are compared, and further study of the phenomenon is recommended.对比分析某种现象的两种方法,然后建议深入调查:文章【没有提到两种"方法"!】。
Unfortunately, longterm data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.这句可以看做是是个警告语气,符合warning.
its soundness is examined 不是他的可信性被证实了,而是可信性被推敲了
C为什么不对呢
定位句:Unfortunately, longterm data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.
全文最后一句一个问题的答案,不是预测什么,语气上明显是一个警告
错选D;体会作者并没有用直接的言论反驳别人的观点,而是平静的指出人家人家有瑕疵点,数据支持不够
求问 warning哪里能够体现呀
最后一句不是说:postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论