The higher the level of certain vitamins and minerals in the bloodstream, the better a person's lung function, as measured by the amount of air the person can expel in one second. The lung function of smokers is significantly worse, on average, than that of nonsmokers. Clearly, therefore, one way for smokers to improve their lung function is for them to increase their intake of foods that are rich in these helpful vitamins and minerals.
Which of the following is an assumption on which this argument depends?
Smokers are less likely than nonsmokers to have diets that are rich in vitamins and minerals.
The lung function of smokers whose diets are rich in those vitamins and minerals is generally better than that of nonsmokers with comparable diets.
People whose diets are deficient in those vitamins and minerals do not typically have other health problems in addition to diminished lung function.
Stopping smoking will not typically improve lung function more than any diet changes can.
Smoking does not introduce into the body chemicals that prevent the helpful vitamins and minerals from entering the bloodstream.
手段,吃富含V和M的食物→改善吸烟者的肺功能
搭桥(取反最好了啦)
A、吸烟者习惯比不吸烟的吃V和M少,个人习惯与题目中链条无关
B、同样吃V和M,吸烟者比不吸烟的肺功能好,变量是吸烟与否,WRONG
C、不喜欢吃V和M的人(注意是人!!!)没有其他损耗肺功能的坏习惯,他因削弱
D、对肺,戒烟的效果不比改善饮食好到哪儿去,与V和M无关
E、吸烟不会导致对V和M吸收困难,CORRECT!!!!取反就更明显啦!!!
方案模式,否定了否定性副作用
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论