Most of the world's supply of uranium currently comes from mines. It is possible to extract uranium from seawater, but the cost of doing so is greater than the price that uranium fetches on the world market. Therefore, until the cost of extracting uranium from seawater can somehow be reduced, this method of obtaining uranium is unlikely to be commercially viable.
Which of the following would it be most useful to determine in evaluating the argument?
Whether the uranium in deposits on land is rapidly being depleted
Whether most uranium is used near where it is mined
Whether there are any technological advances that show promise of reducing the cost of extracting uranium from seawater
Whether the total amount of uranium in seawater is significantly greater than the total amount of uranium on land
Whether uranium can be extracted from freshwater at a cost similar to the cost of extracting it from seawater
一般我看到有price的题目,就会提醒自己考虑demand-supply-price关系,A选项的deposits就是supply, supply降低导致price升高,这样原本比market price高的海水开采价格有可能等于或者小于这个价格,所以即使成本没降,也有商业价值了。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论