For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city. There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?
The exhaust from Palitito's few automobiles is not a significant threat to Palitito's buildings.
Palitito's Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine exhaust.
Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from one site to another.
More tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by any other single means of transportation.
Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitito while their passengers are visiting a site.
手段,🚌闲逛破坏环境→提供🚌车位会好很多
加强
A、🚌没那么破坏环境,反原文
B、引擎破坏环境,与闲逛、车位无关
C、🚌运输客人的时间不超过1/4,则其闲逛的时间(暗示可以停在车位的时间)高达3/4,有车位是有意义的,CORRECT
D、有更多人乘坐🚌来玩,与闲逛、车位无关
E、🚌找不见车位,削弱
可行性强
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论