From 1978 to 1988, beverage containers accounted for a steadily decreasing percentage of the total weight of household garbage in the United States. The increasingly widespread practice of recycling aluminum and glass was responsible for most of this decline. However, although aluminum recycling was more widely practiced in this period than glass recycling, it was found that the weight of glass bottles in household garbage declined by a greater percentage than the weight of aluminum cans.
Which of the following, if true of the United States in the period 1978 to 1988, most helps to account for the finding?
Glass bottles are significantly heavier than aluminum cans of comparable size.
Recycled aluminum cans were almost all beverage containers, but a significant fraction of the recycled glass bottles had contained products other than beverages.
Manufacturers replaced many glass bottles, but few aluminum cans, with plastic containers.
The total weight of glass bottles purchased by households increased at a slightly faster rate than the total weight of aluminum cans.
In many areas, glass bottles had to be sorted by color of the glass before being recycled, whereas aluminum cans required no sorting.
又做发现D值得好好推敲,居民购买的玻璃制品的总重量增加的速度快,即居民产生的玻璃制品垃圾速度快,即产生的玻璃制品垃圾多,则其占垃圾的比重也大,但无法说明为何其占回收垃圾重量的占比所减少的更多。(一面回收,一面快速产生玻璃垃圾)。不知道是不是我想多了……
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论