Plant scientists have used genetic engineering on seeds to produce crop plants that are highly resistant to insect damage. Unfortunately, the seeds themselves are quite expensive, and the plants require more fertilizer and water to grow well than normal ones. Thus, for most farmers the savings on pesticides would not compensate for the higher seed costs and the cost of additional fertilizer. However, since consumer demand for grains, fruits, and vegetables grown without the use of pesticides continues to rise, the use of genetically engineered seeds of this kind is likely to become widespread.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
The first supplies a context for the argument; the second is the argument's main conclusion.
The first introduces a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second is a state of affairs that the argument denies will be part of that outcome.
The first presents a development that the argument predicts will have a certain outcome; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that prediction.
The first provides evidence to support a prediction that the argument seeks to defend; the second is that prediction.
The first and the second each provide evidence to support the argument's main conclusion.
A选项错在哪里?development 这个词在本题中应该如何理解?
第一个黑体字不是背景,而是给出了一个seeds的缺点。黑体字的题目中,不用理解一些抽象名词,比如,这里就完全不用管development的意思,只关心它身后的同位语从句的意思就行了。
背景应该怎么定义呢?本段第一句话可以看做是背景吗?
1. 和核心推理无关的部分都可以被称为是背景。
2. 可以。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论