Columnist: People should avoid using a certain artificial fat that has been touted as a resource for those whose medical advisers have advised them to reduce their fat intake. Although the artificial fat, which can be used in place of fat in food preparation, has none of the negative health effects of fat, it does have a serious drawback: it absorbs certain essential vitamins, thereby preventing them from being used by the body.
In evaluating the columnist's position, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?
Whether increasing one's intake of the vitamins can compensate for the effects of the artificial fat
Whether the vitamins that the artificial fat absorbs are present in foods that contain the fat
Whether having an extremely low fat intake for an extended period can endanger the health
Whether there are any foods that cannot be prepared using the artificial fat as a substitute for other fats
Whether people are generally able to detect differences in taste between foods prepared using the artificial fat and foods that are similar except for the use of other fats
C - 就算不用artificial fat / reduce fat intake, 也不一定代表就会是extremely low fat intake 这种结果呀。C不正确,没在argument的逻辑链上。
A - argument是个方案题,讲述了方案可能存在的否定性副作用,则evaluation 方向 - 是否真的会产生这个否定性副作用呢?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论