Paint on a new airliner is usually applied in two stages: first, a coat of primer, and then a top coat. A new process requires no primer, but instead uses two layers of the same newly developed coating, with each layer of the new coating having the same thickness and weight as a traditional top coat. Using the new process instead of the old process increases the price of a new aircraft considerably.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that it is in an airline's long-term economic interest to purchase new airliners painted using the new process rather than the old process?
Although most new airliners are still painted using the old process, aircraft manufacturers now offer a purchaser of any new airliner the option of having it painted using the new process instead.
A layer of primer on an airliner weighs more than a layer of the new coating would by an amount large enough to make a difference to that airliner's load-bearing capacity.
A single layer of the new coating provides the aluminum skin of the airliner with less protection against corrosion than does a layer of primer of the usual thickness.
Unlike the old process, the new process was originally invented for use on spacecraft, which are subject to extremes of temperature to which airliners are never exposed.
Because the new coating has a viscosity similar to that of a traditional top coat, aircraft manufacturers can apply it using the same equipment as is used for a traditional top coat.
类比
每层新的都与顶层那个(没有因为新旧而改变)的thickness and weight一样,新的更贵
但增强,
证明新比旧好(符合长期经济利益),找新的优点(两者不同之处)
A、新的被提供,无关新的优点
B、旧的比新的更重,对 airliner's load-bearing capacity 造成影响,CORRECT(新的的保质期更长,耐用)
C、新的没有旧的保护得好,削弱
D、新的用于宇宙飞船,能耐airline永远不会经历的高温;无关
E、相似之处,削弱
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论