Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.
The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that
serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists
很明显D选项更贴切...为啥我会选E...
①scientists enter the field with the goal==》
②scientist认为他的colleague也是有这样的goal的
结论:当一个科学家expound science to 普通大众,那么其他科学家就认为这个科学家不是colleague了
很显然:相同goal==》colleague
expound science to general audiences==》不是colleague
expound science to general audiences==》不相同的goal
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论