Manufacturers sometimes discount the price of a product to retailers for a promotion period when the product is advertised to consumers. Such promotions often result in a dramatic increase in amount of product sold by the manufacturers to retailers. Nevertheless, the manufacturers could often make more profit by not holding the promotions.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim above about the manufacturers' profit?
The amount of discount generally offered by manufacturers to retailers is carefully calculated to represent the minimum needed to draw consumers' attention to the product.
For many consumer products the period of advertising discounted prices to consumers is about a week, not sufficiently long for consumers to become used to the sale price.
For products that are not newly introduced, the purpose of such promotions is to keep the products in the minds of consumers and to attract consumers who are currently using competing products.
During such a promotion retailers tend to accumulate in their warehouses inventory bought at discount; they then sell much of it later at their regular price.
If a manufacturer fails to offer such promotions but its competitor offers them, that competitor will tend to attract consumers away from the manufacturer's product.
应该是因果推论中的现象解释型题目,A应该导致B,但现实中A没有导致B,why? 找到A没有导致B的原因应该就是答案
那是不是可以这样理解,A是促销期间给零售商的销量大量增加,B是促销期间利润应该更高,然而实际情况是没有导致B,那原因就是在促销期间的实际给消费者的销量并没有大幅增加,而是活动之后更多产品按正常价格销售了。(如果这样解释对的话,厂家的利润难道是和零售商的销量*价格成正比?)
sorry, 我理解错了,题中要找没有促销比有促销利润高的原因,这样就显而易见了,零售商低价囤货,影响后期进货量,我理解成办促销期间和促销后的利润对比了。。。。。。。这次对了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论