United States hospitals have traditionally relied primarily on revenues from paying patients to offset losses from unreimbursed care. Almost all paying patients now rely on governmental or private health insurance to pay hospital bills. Recently, insurers have been strictly limiting what they pay hospitals for the care of insured patients to amounts at or below actual costs.
Which of the following conclusions is best supported by the information above?
Although the advance of technology has made expensive medical procedures available to the wealthy, such procedures are out of the reach of low-income patients.
If hospitals do not find ways of raising additional income for unreimbursed care, they must either deny some of that care or suffer losses if they give it.
Some patients have incomes too high for eligibility for governmental health insurance but are unable to afford private insurance for hospital care.
If the hospitals reduce their costs in providing care, insurance companies will maintain the current level of reimbursement, thereby providing more funds for unreimbursed care.
Even though philanthropic donations have traditionally provided some support for the hospitals, such donations are at present declining.
US医院一般依赖税收、政府、保险补上亏空(病人没能支付的费用)
但现在保险准备降低给医院的补贴
总结题
A、低收入病人用不了先进而昂贵的治疗方式,无关
B、如果医院找不到其他补上亏空的方法,就只能拒绝给付不了钱的病人治病、或接受亏损,CORRECT
C、一些病人的收入对于纳税太高,对于保险太低,无关
D、如果医院降低费用,保险公司就会保持当前的偿还水平,就会有更多未支付的亏空被补上。(其实有点反原文了,按照原文,真实情况可能是,保险公司会降低偿还水平,医院会更倒霉),总体上无关且NM
E、一些donation降低了,原文NM,又是conclusion题,因此直接排除
演绎推理
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论