A study on couples' retirement transitions found that women who took new jobs after retiring from their primary careers reported high marital satisfaction, more than when retiring completely.
more than when retiring
more than if they were to retire
more so than those who retired
which was more so than those retiring
which was more than if they had retired
(B) they指代前面的women,表达意思错误,因为if they were to retire表达了同一群妇女不同情况下的satisfaction对比,改变了原句意思,原句要表达的是不同妇女不同情况下的satisfaction对比;more than前后不平行。
(C) 正确,those指代women,who took和who retired平行。
(D) which与so都指代satisfaction,重复;which就近修饰satisfaction不符合语义
(E) they指代前面的women,表达意思错误,与A选项相同;没有特殊的时间标志说明需要用过去完成时had retired。
It is used in making a "more than" type of comparison where you also want to refer to a previously stated verb/action (that's where the "so" comes in). In this case, the "so" refers to "reported high marital satisfaction."
Notice here that you are comparing two groups of women: those who take new jobs, and those who retire completely. When making a comparison, you have to make sure you explicitly mention both groups.
B, C, and D don't do this. (In fact, B and D change the original meaning of the sentence to make the second part of the comparison a hypothetical - but the original meaning is that the ones who take new jobs are being compared to those who don't.)
Also remember that, for comparisons, the two things/groups / whatever compared should be parallel. "women who took" and "those who retired" are parallel. The other options aren't.
A,比较对象不一致,且doing缺少逻辑主语
B,they是完全指代,不合理
C correct
It is used in making a "more than" type of comparison where you also want to refer to a previously stated verb/action (that's where the "so" comes in). In this case, the "so" refers to "reported high marital satisfaction."
It is used in making a "more than" type of comparison where you also want to refer to a previously stated verb / action (that's where the "so" comes in). In this case, the "so" refers to "reported high marital satisfaction."
Notice here that you are comparing two groups of women: those who take new jobs, and those who retire completely. When making a comparison, you have to make sure you explicitly mention both groups.
In fact, B and D change the original meaning of the sentence to make the second part of the comparison a hypothetical - but the original meaning is that the ones who take new jobs are being compared to those who don't.
for comparisons, they two things / groups / whatever compared should be parallel. "women who took" and "those who retired" are parallel.
In this case, the "so" refers to "reported high marital satisfaction."
RULE: if it's not a specific NOUN that can be replaced by a PRONOUN (usually "it"), then use the all-purpose replacement "...so".
more than的题还是要重点关注平行,前句是 woman who took...after.... 我们期待的平行的比较是... who....
(A) 缺少指代women的代词,致使more than的比较对象不对等
(B) they指代前面的women,表达意思错误,因为if they were to retire表达了同一群妇女不同情况下
的satisfaction对比,改变了原句意思,原句要表达的是不同妇女不同情况下的satisfaction对比
(C) 正确,those指代women,who took和who retired平行。it/they/that/those只能指代名词,不能指代句子,so可以reported high marital satisfaction
(D) which不能指代一件事或者一句话
(E) they指代错误同B;没有特殊的时间标志说明需要用过去完成时had retired。
2、这样只剩下CorD,C的语法和整句是契合的
省略式的说法
more作为同位语,which指代high marital satisfaction,这里应该是women were more,不是这些满意度more
省略式的说法
首先比较的对象是不同的女性(不完全退休和完全退休这两种),所以DE的定语从句针对的是satisfaction,不对。
A, more than 前后不对称
B,they 代指women? 那个这个代指就会同时囊括前句women以及其定语从句
those who retired对应前句的women who took new jobs
more so than ,so代指前句,more than是连接词(?)
严格讲起来,由于比较句是SVO结构,women reported satisfaction,后面跟的比较对象是要补出谓语动词的,这里按句意来理解,women reported more satisfaction than those women reported satisfaction,而不是women reported more satisfaction than reported those women 。