India, like Italy and China, has no single dominant cuisine: Indian food comprises many different styles of cooking, with each a product of their regional influences, from the fiery vegetarian dishes of the south to the Portuguese-influenced Goan cooking of the west, to the more familiar Mogul food of the north.
with each a product of their
with each as a product of its
each products of their
each a product of
each products of
A,with each+product,错误,同时each是单数,后面不用their;
B,with each as a product of its……,with each+介宾结构作独立主格,修饰印度食物包含很多种类这个句子,语意上=with each style of cooking as product of influence=每种烹饪类型作为地区影响力的产物,主从句在逻辑关系上不属于独立主格表示的原因/条件/伴随发生的事项或补充说明里的任何一种,错误
D是同位语,解释说明先行词style,each a product of=each style of cooking (是)a product of influence,每种烹饪类型都是地区影响力的产物,ok
“独立主格结构”是由名词或代词作为逻辑主语,加上分词、形容词、副词、动词不定式或介词短语作为逻辑谓语构成。这种结构在形式上与主句没有关系,通常称为“独立主格结构”。
虽然叫做独立主格结构,并不是真正的独立,它还是一种从属分句,在句中有多种作用。如:表原因、表条件、表方式、表伴随、表时间等,在句中起状语作用。
我觉得这里用with没错,但是问题在于its regional influences 的表述是错误的。
独立主格是要修饰主句的,这里不是要修饰印度菜有很多种类这件事,而是在解释说明这些种类—每一种都是地区影响力的产物,用定语或同位语。借着你的回复,把这个题又做了一遍,做对了,哈哈哈。
its influences应该是可以的,比如my books
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论