扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E1-SC-148
In contrast to some fish eggs requiring months to incubate, the Rio Grande silvery minnow produces eggs that hatch in about 24 hours, yielding larvae that can swim in just three to four days.
some fish eggs requiring months to incubate
some fish, whose eggs require months to incubate
some fish that have eggs requiring months to incubate
the requirement of months of incubation for some fish eggs
requiring months of incubation, as some fish eggs do
还没有题目讲解（毕出老师会陆续发布对官方考题的解读，请保持关注）。
for instance, consider the following:
in contrast to some other restaurants in the area, Les Jardins only serves beer and wine, not hard liquor.
--> this sentence ALREADY implies that "some other restaurants" serve hard liquor. therefore, if you're going to add that reference for emphasis, you should make it a nonessential modifier:
in contrast to some other restaurants in the area, which serve a range of hard spirits, Les Jardins only serves beer and wine, not hard liquor.
for the same reason, you want commas around this modifier. if you don't have them, the sentence actually becomes redundant!
c）限制性定语从句，表示的是其修饰名词的一个子集
类似woman teacher；woman's teacher
c的意思表达的是一种是“卵孵化需要数月的鱼”，还有一种“卵孵化不需要数月的鱼“，孵化数月只是一种鱼，所以逻辑上不如b好
不能说鱼拥有蛋，蛋就是鱼创造出来的，没有鱼就没有蛋，就如不能说人拥有头发，是人的头发；不能说家庭拥有电，不能说中国拥有建筑，是建筑在中国；可以说中国拥有13亿人
in contrast to，介词，后面+名词，表示与……相反，与主句的某个名词构成比较
C 限制性定语从句，将一些鱼类分成了两类，即：“卵孵化需要数月的鱼”和“卵孵化不需要数月的鱼“两类
根据语意，即然句子要表达的是与silvery minnow这种鱼卵的情况来比较，那么就不可能用可以分成两种情况的鱼来比较，故限制性定语修饰错误，应用非限制性定语，B正确。
同求，prep笔记描述的是 have 不好，但是感觉定语从句的差别更重要。且鱼肯定是可被是否需有很多月来孵化的蛋来分类从而缩小限定范围的。莫非是因为C中的requiring 不做论元？ 而不能进入前者限定，所有鱼都have eggs所以不用 限定性从句，但是这个并不能解释为什么B的结构要用 ，which 而不是that登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论