扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E1-SC-40
With an awareness that there are connotations associated with the numbers 1 and 2 and the letters A and B, companies conducting consumer taste tests of foods or beverages typically choose numbers such as 697 or 483 to label the products.
With an awareness that there are connotations associated with the numbers 1 and 2 and the letters A and B
Because the numbers 1 and 2 and the letters A and B have connotations they are aware of
Because of an awareness of the numbers 1 and 2 and the letters A and B having connotations
Aware of the connotations of the numbers 1 and 2 and the letters A and B
Since the numbers 1 and 2 and the letters A and B have connotations associated with them and they are aware of it
还没有题目讲解（毕出老师会陆续发布对官方考题的解读，请保持关注）。
A可以理解成公司和这个awareness一起choose numbers
先剔除语法，从语义上自己解读下：A: with+名词短语，“带着……”的意思，表示“公司带着……选择”；
B：因为这些数字等有（他们意识到的）隐含含义，所以公司……；
C：同B；
D：（因为他们）意识到这些数字等的隐含含义，公司……；
显然“意识到”这个动作作为从句的核心词更能表达逻辑关系。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
the problem with (a) is that it says only that companies are aware "that there ARE connotations". but the companies don't necessarily know what those connotations are.
//
i am aware that discounts are available this weekend.
--> i know that there ARE discounts, but i don't necessarily know the specifics.
i am aware of the discounts available this weekend.
--> i actually know the specifics (percentages or whatever) of the discounts.
* According to the sentence, the companies are intentionally avoiding the use of "A", "B", "1", "2", etc. So, common sense dictates that they're aware of the reason; they are certainly not avoiding those labels at random!
the problem with (a) is that it says only that companies are aware "that there are connotations". in other words, literally, the companies just know that there are connotations -- in other words, that connotations (of some sort) exist -- but the companies don't necessarily know what those connotations are.
the correct answer, on the other hand, explicitly states that the companies are "aware of the connotations" -- i.e., aware of the actual nature of those connotations.
analogy:
i am aware that discounts are available this weekend.
--> i know that there ARE discounts, but i don't necessarily know the specifics.
i am aware of the discounts available this weekend.
--> i actually know the specifics (percentages or whatever) of the discounts.
* (A), (C), and (E) don't deliver the intended meaning.
I.e., these choices don't actually say that the companies know what the connotations are. It just says that the companies know "that there are connotations".
This is a HUGE difference. If the distinction is not immediately obvious to you, consider the following sentences:
1/ I know that there are passwords for all of your bank accounts.
2/ I know the passwords for all of your bank accounts.
i am aware that discounts are available this weekend. 知道有discount这件事，但不知道具体
i am aware of the discounts available this weekend.
C，aware是形容词，comma+adj，省略be动词作状语，类似于现在/过去分词作状语的用法。
如：Content about the achievement, she smiles.
Aware that something is wrong, they stopped.
A，with+noun that不是伴随状语，with+（noun）+动词现在/过去分词才是伴随状语
A可以理解成公司和这个awareness一起choose numbers
With+名词+现在/过去分词，是独立主格。With+名词+that不是独立主格，不能做状语修饰一个句子
E.g: **With an awareness that the price in mall is too high, consumer chooses to shop online.
A do sth with B,A和B一起做某事。会让人误以为consumer choose to shop online with an wareness.--------by lizzyfly
还希望这道题能有毕出老师解答一下正确的解释
B选项不是错在they，B选项的主干意思是因为数字和字母有connotation，（公司意识到变成了次要成分），所以公司选择数字，这样主句从句之间的逻辑关系是不合理的，应该是公司意识到有关系，所以公司选择。错不在因果，在于成分的变化。
个人看法登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
B：因為有被認識到的聯繫，重點不是練習，而是認識到練習；
C：因為有認識，有認識不重要，但是要知道認識到了什麼練習，有聯繫也不重要，因為練習是客觀事實，重點是認識到了什麼練習；
D：因為意識到了練習，所以做出了選擇，最為合理；
E：同B。
Similarly:
the person I spoke to --> no; the person to whom I spoke --> yes.
the stores (that) most people shop at --> no; the stores at which most people shop --> yes.
The "no"s here are worth noticing because they are cornerstones of SPOKEN English (i.e., an altogether different language). If English isn't your first language, then avoiding these will, ironically, be much easier than if it were.
It's certainly not a way of expressing emphasis. As far as the GMAT is concerned, there's no difference between "there are Xs" and "Xs exist", and there's no difference between "there are Xs in this place" and "Xs are in this place".
---- YOU DON'T NEED TO KNOW ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE FOR THE TEST ----
In terms of the GMAT, as I stated above the line, there's no difference.
In general usage, in fact, the construction without "there is/are" is generally more emphatic.
e.g.,
Mr. Wong, there are two people in your office. --> ok, we're just counting people, presumably for some reason mentioned earlier in the conversation.
Mr. Wong, two people are in your office. --> I specifically want to draw your attention to the people. "They want to see you", or "You should be aware that they're there; maybe you don't want them there."
BE的they指代不清，排除；
剩下最具有迷惑性的AD；
btw这里的with用法没有问题
摘自RON：
the problem with (a) is that it says only that companies are aware \"that there are connotations\". in other words, literally, the companies just know that there are connotations -- in other words, that connotations (of some sort) exist -- but the companies don\'t necessarily know what those connotations are.
the correct answer, on the other hand, explicitly states that the companies are \"aware o
大概意思就A.公司知道有这么一个意思 但D.公司知道12AB的意思，所以选择数字xxxx
D总体更佳。
the problem with A is that the adjectival Modifier is wrong here, it reads as if the Taste Test is Conducted WITH the awareness. So it seems as if the opening modifier is modifying the test not the companies.
(A) 句子结构不够简洁
(B) they指代不清, 既可以向前指代numbers, letters又可以向后指代companies
(C) Because of + n + having…表现复杂,应该改为Because从句
(D) 正确, aware of 置于句首修饰companies, 句子结构简单,意思清晰
(E) have connotations associated with them表达复杂;they指代不清,it无指代