The bones of Majungatholus atopus, a meat-eating dinosaur that is a distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembles South American predatory dinosaurs, have been discovered in Madagascar.
The bones of Majungatholus atopus, a meat-eating dinosaur that is a distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembles South American predatory dinosaurs, have been discovered in Madagascar.
The bones of a meat-eating dinosaur, Majungatholus atopus, a distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex and with a close resemblance to South American predatory dinosaurs, has been discovered in Madagascar.
In Madagascar, the bones of a meat-eating dinosaur, Majungatholus atopus, distantly related to Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembled South American predatory dinosaurs, have been discovered.
A distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex, bearing a close resemblance to South American predatory dinosaurs is Majungatholus atopus, a meat-eating dinosaur, the bones of which have been discovered in Madagascar.
A distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex and closely resembling South American predatory dinosaurs, the bones of a meat-eating dinosaur, Majungatholus atopus, have been discovered in Madagascar.
陷阱陷阱C 看起来可太漂亮的平行了 可是resemble应该是主动啊->resembling
related是个分词
when "related" is a verb, it takes an object and an "of" phrase: the paper related concept X to concept Y.
resumbled表被动,这里应该是resumbling
c, resembled 是分词, 不能和前面related to(过去时态动词)平行, 除非改为' resembling'
c选项应该是resembling
同位语的意思是用来解释说明的,不管是把小范围的放在同位语,或者把范围大的放在同位语,都可以表示补充说明。如:Xiaoming, a boy, ……是在补充说明xiaoming,A boy, xiaoming,……,细分了先行词的具体名称,一个叫小明的男孩,
但是在句意上,到底谁做先行词,谁做同位语,要看句子主体结构选哪个比较合适。 本题 ma放在同谓语上不好,整个去掉的话,就相当于损失这个信息的主体
A,a meat-eating dinosaur that is a distant relative of Tyrannosaurus rex and (that) closely resembles South American predatory dinosaurs, 平行
C,同位语概念应该比所修饰的词的概念要宽泛,a meat-eating dinosaur, MA,表示a meat-eating dinosaur的内容是MA这种动物,这是不对的,食肉动物有好多种,不是食肉动物是MA,改成MA,a meat-eating dinosaur,用一种食肉动物来解释MA这个动物,ok
有道理
哈哈,这一点我当初理解错了。同位语既可以是范围大的也可以是范围小的。本题主要是看哪个做主语更符合句子主干表达的意思。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
c related和resembled分别是形容词和动词,不并列
"related" can be either a past-tense verb or a participle. in this case, though, it's a participle.
when "related" is a verb, it takes an object and an "of" phrase: the paper related concept X to concept Y.
"resembled" is always a past-tense verb.
worse yet, the use of "resembled" makes (c) a run-on, even if nothing is parallel to it. if this past-tense verb is in there
ccc 介词短语In Madagascar离它的修饰对象have been discovered太远
A的closely resembles 前面没有缺少一个that吗?
in choice (c), "distantly related to Tyrannosaurus rex" is not parallel to "closely resembled South American predatory dinosaurs". you can't put a participle in parallel to a past-tense verb.
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/prep2-sc-65306-the-bones-of-majungatholus-atopus-t5574.html
先给出是谁,再做属性描述
C的定语并列有问题,之前有题目也是这么玩的,不过resembling 表主动在这里作定语比较靠谱
c句子重心过于强调地点
distantly related to Tyrannosaurus rex 与 closely resembled South American predatory dinosaurs不平行,related在这是分词形式,而resembled是过去式,换成resembling就还说的通。
relate和resemble都是谓语动词的过去时。the bones related...and resembled...
distantly,和closely都是副词修饰动作的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
The bones of Majungatholus atopus 与the bones of a meat-eating dinosaur,还是有区别的,前者是一种具体的恐龙,后面来解释这种恐龙的属性,后者是概括的一种的恐龙。另外,A和C时态也不一样。不知道这样理解对不对?
可能是因为要让范畴更小更具体的部分当作限制性定语, 其他的成为非限制性定语。
这里 Majungatholus atopus 比 a meat-eating dinosaur更具体一些吧
同问, c错在哪里啊
resembling 这里明显是主动,不是被动哦,所以用现在分词而不是过去分词
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
请问这题C错在哪了
我看到有解释说, 介词短语 In Madagascar 离他的修饰对象 have been discovered 太远
我也看到过这种解释,但是我感觉即使离太远也并没有造成语义混乱呀,所以这个理由还是有点牵强吧,不过谢谢你啦
C应该是错在closely resembled, 应该是closely resembling
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论