扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E1-SC-69
The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.
passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell
the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell
the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
Ron：which是可以跳跃介词短语修饰名词，但是前提是这个介词短语必须是修饰which从句要去修饰的那个名词的。in 1999明显是修饰passage,不是修饰act.所以不可以跳跃。所以B错误
1）xxx导致了法案的通过 而不是法案 因此排除D E
2）法案which allows....而不是法案的通过allowing... 因此排除A
是passage发生在1999，法案的撰写不一定在1999
proliferation导致了法案的通过，而非法案，排除DE
B,in 1999应该作定语修饰passage，是1999通过的法案，而不是1999的法案
A allowing的主语是proliferation，错误
C correct
which引导的非限定定语从句要尽量贴近被修饰的东西
是passage发生在1999，要就近修饰
另外B选项中they will sell them later，两个代词代指不同，错误
而且若in 1999放在Act后面，则which allows不可跳跃修饰Act
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
which是可以跳跃介词短语修饰名词，但是前提是这个介词短语必须是修饰which从句要去修饰的那个名词的。
A allowing修飾到proliferation
which修饰前方最靠近的那个名字，所以AB，which都修饰了1999.
for A and B: * the "which" erroneously refers to "1999".——Ron
理解句意啊，不能只烤靠找平行关系，人句意里面就无关平行
B:* "the intent that they will sell them later..." they 指代不清楚既可以解读为the companies也可以解读为those who XXX. * the "which" erroneously refers to "1999". 即使可以考虑跳跃修饰也不如直接把act 放在which 前面好， 是ACT allows
1) 动名词结构含有正在进行的意思,多表示动作的过程
2) 修饰语应该尽可能靠近修饰对象,否则很容易引起修饰不清
3) of + doing修饰名词而to do结构修饰动词,表示目的
A 用 allowing 就会使 allow 找个词汇的发起者和这句话的逻辑主语也就是 the proliferation 一致，allow 应该是法律干的，A 选项发起者不对，错误。
B 用 which allows显然告诉我 allow 的发起者和前面的动作发起者不一样了，B 和 C 前面差不多，后面一个用 those who 后面又用 they，连续出现代词并且指的东西不一样，读起来有点乱。
C 用 which allows 正确。
D 用 it allows， 这个 it 前面加了 and， 就会使 it 只能指代前面的主语 the proliferation，it 指代不对，错误。
E 用 and allowing 显然这个动词发起者不对，错误。
in 1999 is a separate description, you cannot jump it.
what happened in 1999?
the passage of the law happened in 1999.
therefore, "in 1999" should be placed as close as possible to "the passage". the placement in this choice is ideal.
考察用语精准，导致法令的通过，而不是导致法令;which从句和doing的区别；语序是否会导致歧义。
PaaSing错，因为既不是personalize，也不是process-oriented
DE, lead to the act 错，
A allowing modifies led to! Incorret！
ok fine，b选项，1999时间的modifier最好紧靠修饰词；还有就是，they will sell them导致了指代不明确，有歧义，所以b错误。
导致了某事的发生，这里这件事已经发生好了，有时间终点，用名词比用从句好。