扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E1-SC-91
Although they are more temperamental and far more expensive than transistor-driven amplifiers, many audiophiles and audio professionals prefer the warmer, richer tones produced by vacuum-tube-driven amplifiers.
many audiophiles and audio professionals prefer the warmer, richer tones produced by vacuum-tube-driven amplifiers
many audiophiles and audio professionals think the warmer, richer tones produced by vacuum-tube-driven amplifiers make them preferable
warmer, richer tones are produced by vacuum-tube-driven amplifiers and they are thus preferred by many audiophiles and audio professionals
vacuum-tube-driven amplifiers are preferred because they produce warmer, richer tones by many audiophiles and audio professionals
vacuum-tube-driven amplifiers are preferred by many audiophiles and audio professionals because these amplifiers produce warmer, richer tones
提示主句主语也应该是某种amplifiers，排除ABC
D，by....距离过远，会造成歧义
E correct
D by the位置不对，有歧义。"
abc都是amplifier都是modifier， C 平行的逻辑有误, D 会造成歧义because后面整个是原因状语从句。
abc选项中从句中的they优先指代了audiophiles and audio professionals和warmer, richer tones，导致逻辑❌
d选项中prefer和by之间相隔太远，造成修饰不当，同时会造成歧义“produce xxx by”
选项A：主句的主干是many audiophiles and audio professionals prefer the warmer, richer tones. 这样从句中they所指代的vacuum-tube-driven amplifiers变成了tones的定语。无法形成让步转折关系
选项B，C错误分析同选项A。从句描述了一个vacuum-tube-driven amplifiers不好的地方（反复无常且太贵），逻辑上转折以后需要要描述优点
选项D：preferred距离by audiophiles and professionals太远
D中的by sb离V太远了
我理解的是：前句they指代的对象应该是vacuum-tube-driven amplifiers 而不是这些发烧友和专家（audiophiles and audio professionals ）
后面有by amplifiers，所以they应该没什么问题，我感觉这个应该主要是语义上错了。
逻辑主语。只有两个amplifier才可以比较。amplifier 和 pros 不可以拿来比。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论