At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available
the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables
D,a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
1.呆的时间短——花钱少
时间和花的钱具有相关性——因果倒置,应该是因为花钱少(点的吃的少),才会呆的时间短
eg:一个人先想好了自己吃全家桶,进到店里他就会点全家桶,全家桶比较贵比较多,自然吃的时间就会变长——所以D不成立
根据原文中的正常情况,如果他坐在高座椅吃,可能吃的快一些而已,但不会因为做的是高座椅就不吃贵的全家桶,而去吃便宜的汉堡了。
2.且这一项原文根本没提及,问题问的是grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论