At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available
the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables
这道题2分钟我都做不出来吧...
C:如果H的店主增加高凳,他的利润会增加
P:顾客来H看名人,他们更喜欢高凳;
P:高凳的顾客停留的时间比一般桌椅的顾客停留时间短(typically说明这是一般情况)
结论中,换了高凳会怎样(来这家餐厅的人多了),怎么影响了利润(坐高凳的一般停留时间短)
C,generalization对应的是typically,H的顾客是这个常识的例外,意思就是在H坐高凳的顾客停留的时间会更长,所以直接攻击了P,跪了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论